The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The agricultural pathology of ant fungus gardens
Open accessAbstract
Gardens of fungus-growing ants (Formicidae: Attini) traditionally have been thought to be free of microbial parasites, with the fungal mutualist maintained in nearly pure “monocultures.” We conducted extensive isolations of “alien” (nonmutualistic) fungi from ant gardens of a phylogenetically representative collection of attine ants. Contrary to the long-standing assumption that gardens are maintained free of microbial pathogens and parasites, they are in fact host to specialized parasites that are only known from attine gardens and that are found in most attine nests. These specialized garden parasites, belonging to the microfungus genus Escovopsis (Ascomycota: anamorphic Hypocreales), are horizontally transmitted between colonies. Consistent with theory of virulence evolution under this mode of pathogen transmission, Escovopsis is highly virulent and has the potential for rapid devastation of ant gardens, leading to colony mortality. The specialized parasite Escovopsis is more prevalent in gardens of the more derived ant lineages than in gardens of the more “primitive” (basal) ant lineages. Because fungal cultivars of derived attine lineages are asexual clones of apparently ancient origin whereas cultivars of primitive ant lineages were domesticated relatively recently from free-living sexual stocks, the increased virulence of pathogens associated with ancient asexual cultivars suggests an evolutionary cost to cultivar clonality, perhaps resulting from slower evolutionary rates of cultivars in the coevolutionary race with their pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toro, I. D., Ribbons, R. R., & Pelini, S. L. (2023) · Österreichische Gesellschaft für Entomofaunistik (OEGEF) · doi:10.25849/myrmecol.news_017:133 · Cited by 384
The Origin of the Attine Ant-Fungus Mutualism
Mueller, U. G., Schultz, T. R., Currie, C. R., & Malloch, D. (2001) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/393867 · Cited by 358
Self-citationCoevolved Crypts and Exocrine Glands Support Mutualistic Bacteria in Fungus-Growing Ants
Currie, C. R., Poulsen, M., Mendenhall, J., Boomsma, J. J., & Billen, J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1119744 · Cited by 356
Self-citationBiomineral armor in leaf-cutter ants
Li, H., Sun, C.-Y., Fang, Y., Carlson, C. M., Xu, H., Ješovnik, A., Sosa-Calvo, J., Zarnowski, R., Bechtel, H. A., Fournelle, J. H., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19566-3 · Cited by 58
Self-citationYeasts found on an ephemeral reproductive caste of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa
Arcuri, S. L., Pagnocca, F. C., da Paixão Melo, W. G., Nagamoto, N. S., Komura, D. L., & Rodrigues, A. (2014) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-014-0216-2 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Currie, C. R., Mueller, U. G., & Malloch, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-07-06
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7998-8002
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2049023827
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The agricultural pathology of ant fungus gardens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.14.7998
- The paper
- Currie, C. R., Mueller, U. G., & Malloch, D. (1999). The agricultural pathology of ant fungus gardens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.14.7998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.