Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intravascular flow decreases erythrocyte consumption of nitric oxide

Open access
Liao, James C., W. Hein, Travis, Vaughn, Mark W., Huang, Kuang-Tse, Kuo, Lih·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) produced by the endothelium diffuses both into the lumen and to the smooth muscle cells according to the concentration gradient in each direction. The extremely high reaction rate between NO and hemoglobin (Hb), k Hb = 3–5 × 10 7 M −1 ⋅s −1 , suggests that most of the NO produced would be consumed by Hb in the red blood cells (RBCs), which then would block the biological effect of NO. Therefore, specific mechanisms must exist under physiological conditions to reduce the NO consumption by RBCs, in which the Hb concentration is very high (24 mM heme). By using isolated microvessels as a bioassay, here we show that physiological concentrations of RBCs in the presence of intravascular flow does not inhibit NO-mediated vessel dilation, suggesting that RBCs under this condition are not an NO scavenger. On the other hand, RBCs (50% hematocrit) without intravascular flow reduce NO-mediated dilation to serotonin by 30%. In contrast, free Hb (10 μM) completely inhibits NO-mediated dilation with or without intravascular flow. The effect of flow on NO consumption by RBCs may be attributed to the formation of an RBC-free zone near the vessel wall, which is caused by hydrodynamic forces on particles. Intravascular flow does not affect the reaction rate between NO and free Hb in the lumen, because the latter forms a homogeneous solution and is not subject to the hydrodynamic separation. However, intravascular flow only partially contributes to the reduced consumption of NO by RBCs, because without the flow, the NO consumption by RBCs is already about 3 orders of magnitude slower than free Hb.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8757

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Liao, J. C., W. Hein, T., Vaughn, M. W., Huang, K.-T., & Kuo, L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-07-20
Volume
96
Issue
15
Pages
8757-8761
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2127322546
Cited by
305
References
4
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intravascular flow decreases erythrocyte consumption of nitric oxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.15.8757
The paper
Liao, J. C., W. Hein, T., Vaughn, M. W., Huang, K.-T., & Kuo, L. (1999). Intravascular flow decreases erythrocyte consumption of nitric oxide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.15.8757

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.