The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular characterization of H9N2 influenza viruses: Were they the donors of the “internal” genes of H5N1 viruses in Hong Kong?
Open accessAbstract
The origin of the H5N1 influenza viruses that killed six of eighteen infected humans in 1997 and were highly pathogenic in chickens has not been resolved. These H5N1 viruses transmitted directly to humans from infected poultry. In the poultry markets in Hong Kong, both H5N1 and H9N2 influenza viruses were cocirculating, raising the possibility of genetic reassortment. Here we analyze the antigenic and genetic features of H9N2 influenza viruses with different epidemiological backgrounds. The results suggest that the H9N2 influenza viruses of domestic ducks have become established in the domestic poultry of Asia. Phylogenetic and antigenic analyses of the H9N2 viruses isolated from Hong Kong markets suggest three distinct sublineages. Among the chicken H9N2 viruses, six of the gene segments were apparently derived from an earlier chicken H9N2 virus isolated in China, whereas the PB1 and PB2 genes are closely related to those of the H5N1 viruses and a quail H9N2 virus—A/quail/Hong Kong/G1/97 (Qa/HK/G1/97)—suggesting that many of the 1997 chicken H9 isolates in the markets were reassortants. The similarity of the internal genes of Qa/HK/G1/97 virus to those of the H5N1 influenza viruses suggests that the quail virus may have been the internal gene donor. Our findings indicate that the human and poultry H5N1 influenza viruses in Hong Kong in 1997 were reassortants that obtained internal gene segments from Qa/HK/G1/97. However, we cannot be certain whether the replicate complex of H5N1 originated from Qa/HK/G1/97 or whether the reverse transfer occurred; the available evidence supports the former proposal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Koopmans, M., Wilbrink, B., Conyn, M., Natrop, G., van der Nat, H., Vennema, H., Meijer, A., van Steenbergen, J., Fouchier, R., Osterhaus, A., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15589-x · Cited by 837
Human Infection with an Avian H9N2 Influenza A Virus in Hong Kong in 2003
Butt, K. M., Smith, G. J. D., Chen, H., Zhang, L. J., Leung, Y. H. C., Xu, K. M., Lim, W., Webster, R. G., Yuen, K. Y., Peiris, J. S. M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.11.5760-5767.2005 · Cited by 594
Self-citationGuo, Y. J., Krauss, S., Senne, D. A., Mo, I. P., Lo, K. S., Xiong, X. P., Norwood, M., Shortridge, K. F., Webster, R. G., & Guan, Y. (2000) · Virology · doi:10.1006/viro.1999.0115 · Cited by 462
Self-citationRole of receptor binding specificity in influenza A virus transmission and pathogenesis
de Graaf, M., & Fouchier, R. A. M. (2014) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/embj.201387442 · Cited by 435
Realities and enigmas of human viral influenza: pathogenesis, epidemiology and control.
HILLEMAN, M. (2002) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00254-2 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Guan, Y., Shortridge, K. F., Krauss, S., & Webster, R. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-08-03
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9363-9367
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2092097938
- Cited by
- 735
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular characterization of H9N2 influenza viruses: Were they the donors of the “internal” genes of H5N1 viruses in Hong Kong? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.16.9363
- The paper
- Guan, Y., Shortridge, K. F., Krauss, S., & Webster, R. G. (1999). Molecular characterization of H9N2 influenza viruses: Were they the donors of the “internal” genes of H5N1 viruses in Hong Kong? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.16.9363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.