Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RETRACTED: A new mechanism of neurodegeneration: A proinflammatory cytokine inhibits receptor signaling by a survival peptide

Open access
Venters, Homer D., Tang, Qingsong, Liu, Qiang, VanHoy, Roger W., Dantzer, Robert, Kelley, Keith W.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Heightened expression of both a proinflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and a survival peptide, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), occurs in diverse diseases of the central nervous system, including Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, the AIDS-dementia complex, and cerebral ischemia. Conventional roles for these two proteins are neuroprotection by IGF-I and neurotoxicity by TNF-α. Although the mechanisms of action for IGF-I and TNF-α in the central nervous system originally were established as disparate and unrelated, we hypothesized that the signaling pathways of these two cytokines may interact during neurodegeneration. Here we show that concentrations of TNF-α as low as 10 pg/ml markedly reduce the capacity of IGF-I to promote survival of primary murine cerebellar granule neurons. TNF-α suppresses IGF-I-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS-2) and inhibits IRS-2-precipitable phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase activity. These experiments indicate that TNF-α promotes IGF-I receptor resistance in neurons and inhibits the ability of the IGF-I receptor to tyrosine-phosphorylate the IRS-2 docking molecule and to subsequently activate the critical downstream enzyme phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase. This intracellular crosstalk between discrete cytokine receptors reveals a novel pathway that leads to neuronal degeneration whereby a proinflammatory cytokine inhibits receptor signaling by a survival peptide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9879This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Venters, H. D., Tang, Q., Liu, Q., VanHoy, R. W., Dantzer, R., & Kelley, K. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-08-17
Volume
96
Issue
17
Pages
9879-9884
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2039060098
Cited by
187
References
1
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RETRACTED: A new mechanism of neurodegeneration: A proinflammatory cytokine inhibits receptor signaling by a survival peptide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.17.9879
The paper
Venters, H. D., Tang, Q., Liu, Q., VanHoy, R. W., Dantzer, R., & Kelley, K. W. (1999). RETRACTED: A new mechanism of neurodegeneration: A proinflammatory cytokine inhibits receptor signaling by a survival peptide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.17.9879

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.