DNA methylation in transcriptional repression of two differentially expressed X-linked genes, GPC3 and SYBL1
Open accessAbstract
Methylation of CpG islands is an established transcriptional repressive mechanism and is a feature of silencing in X chromosome inactivation. Housekeeping genes that are subject to X inactivation exhibit differential methylation of their CpG islands such that the inactive alleles are hypermethylated. In this report, we examine two contrasting X-linked genes with CpG islands for regulation by DNA methylation: SYBL1 , a housekeeping gene in the Xq pseudoautosomal region, and GPC3 , a tissue-specific gene in Xq26 that is implicated in the etiology of the Simpson–Golabi–Behmel overgrowth syndrome. We observed that in vitro methylation of either the SYBL1 or the GPC3 promoter resulted in repression of reporter constructs. In normal contexts, we found that both the Y and inactive X alleles of SYBL1 are repressed and hypermethylated, whereas the active X allele is expressed and unmethylated. Furthermore, the Y and inactive X alleles of SYBL1 were derepressed by treatment with the demethylating agent azadeoxycytidine. GPC3 is also subject to X inactivation, and the active X allele is unmethylated in nonexpressing leukocytes as well as in an expressing cell line, suggesting that methylation is not involved in the tissue-specific repression of this allele. The inactive X allele, however, is hypermethylated in leukocytes, presumably reflecting early X inactivation events that become important for gene dosage in expressing lineages. These and other data suggest that all CpG islands on Xq, including the pseudoautosomal region, are subject to X inactivation-induced methylation. Additionally, methylation of SYBL1 on Yq may derive from a process related to X inactivation that targets large chromatin domains for transcriptional repression.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Promoter CGI hypermethylation can silence GPC3 in vitro.
“as promoter CGI hypermethylation can silence GPC3 in vitro74.”
From Multi-omic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma reveals aberrant cis-regulatory changes and dysregulated retrotransposons with prognostic potential (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [2]Battistuzzi, G., D'Urso, M., Toniolo, D., Persico, G. M. & Luzzatto, L. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 1465-1469.
- [7]Lu, S. & Davies, P. J. A. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4692-4697.
- [12]Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY), 2nd Ed.
- [18]Jones, P. A., Wolkowicz, M. J., Rideout, W. M., III, Gonzales, F. A., Marziasz, C. M., Coetzee, G. A. & Tapscott, S. J. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6117-6121.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cheng, C. C. Y., Cheung, M. F., Lee, A. Y., Wu, Q., Chow, S. H.-C., Ang, J. Y. J., Riquelme Medina, I., Lo, G., Wu, H., Yang, W., et al. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-09154-w · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huber, R., Hansen, R. S., Strazzullo, M., Pengue, G., Mazzarella, R., D’Urso, M., Schlessinger, D., Pilia, G., Gartler, S. M., & D’Esposito, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-01-19
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 616-621
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC15185
- OpenAlex
- W2159909619
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01gm052463-05)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-07067, T32GM007067, GM52463)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD016659, HD-16659)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Keywords
- DNA methylation, CpG islands, X chromosome inactivation, transcriptional repression, glypican-3, X-linked genes, Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome, gene dosage, leukocytes
- MeSH terms
- Aza Compounds, Cell Line, Deoxycytidine, Dosage Compensation, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Heparitin Sulfate, Heparan Sulfate, Leukocytes, Membrane Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proteoglycans, Transcription, Genetic, Transfection, X Chromosome, Y Chromosome, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans, R-SNARE Proteins, Glypicans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review