The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Energetic considerations of ciliary beating and the advantage of metachronal coordination
Open accessAbstract
The internal mechanism of cilia is among the most ancient biological motors on an evolutionary scale. It produces beat patterns that consist of two phases: during the effective stroke, the cilium moves approximately as a straight rod, and during the recovery stroke, it rolls close to the surface in a tangential motion. It is commonly agreed that these two phases are designed for efficient functioning: the effective stroke encounters strong viscous resistance and generates thrust, whereas the recovery stroke returns the cilium to starting position while avoiding viscous resistance. Metachronal coordination between cilia, which occurs when many of them beat close to each other, is believed to be an autonomous result of the hydrodynamical interactions in the system. Qualitatively, metachronism is perceived as a way for reducing the energy expenditure required for beating. This paper presents a quantitative study of the energy expenditure of beating cilia, and of the energetic significance of metachronism. We develop a method for computing the work done by model cilia that beat in a viscous fluid. We demonstrate that for a single cilium, beating in water, the mechanical work done during the effective stroke is approximately five times the amount of work done during the recovery stroke. Investigation of multicilia configurations shows that having neighboring cilia beat metachronally is energetically advantageous and perhaps even crucial for multiciliary functioning. Finally, the model is used to approximate the number of dynein arm attachments that are likely to occur during the effective and recovery strokes of a beat cycle, predicting that almost all of the available dynein arms should participate in generating the motion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chlamydomonas Swims with Two “Gears” in a Eukaryotic Version of Run-and-Tumble Locomotion
Polin, M., Tuval, I., Drescher, K., Gollub, J. P., & Goldstein, R. E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172667 · Cited by 462
Gänger, S., & Schindowski, K. (2018) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10030116 · Cited by 447
Emergence of metachronal waves in cilia arrays
Elgeti, J., & Gompper, G. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218869110 · Cited by 377
Spontaneous Creation of Macroscopic Flow and Metachronal Waves in an Array of Cilia
Guirao, B., & Joanny, J.-F. (2007) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.084897 · Cited by 228
Brumley, D. R., Polin, M., Pedley, T. J., & Goldstein, R. E. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.268102 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Gueron, S., & Levit-Gurevich, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-10-26
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12240-12245
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2120625730
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energetic considerations of ciliary beating and the advantage of metachronal coordination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.22.12240
- The paper
- Gueron, S., & Levit-Gurevich, K. (1999). Energetic considerations of ciliary beating and the advantage of metachronal coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.22.12240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.