The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compromised disease resistance in saponin-deficient plants
Open accessAbstract
Saponins are glycosylated plant secondary metabolites found in many major food crops [Price, K. R., Johnson, I. T. & Fenwick, G. R. (1987) CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 26, 27–133]. Because many saponins have potent antifungal properties and are present in healthy plants in high concentrations, these molecules may act as preformed chemical barriers to fungal attack. The isolation of plant mutants defective in saponin biosynthesis represents a powerful strategy for evaluating the importance of these compounds in plant defense. The oat root saponin avenacin A-1 fluoresces under ultraviolet illumination [Crombie, L., Crombie, W. M. L. & Whiting, D. A. (1986) J. Chem. Soc. Perkins 1 , 1917–1922], a property that is extremely rare among saponins. Here we have exploited this fluorescence to isolate saponin-deficient ( sad ) mutants of a diploid oat species, Avena strigosa . These sad mutants are compromised in their resistance to a variety of fungal pathogens, and a number of lines of evidence suggest that this compromised disease resistance is a direct consequence of saponin deficiency. Because saponins are widespread throughout the plant kingdom, this group of secondary metabolites may have general significance as antimicrobial phytoprotectants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two Classes of Plant Antibiotics: Phytoalexins versus "Phytoanticipins"
VanEtten, H. D., Mansfield, J. W., Bailey, J. A., & Farmer, E. E. (1994) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.6.9.1191 · Cited by 710
Saponins and plant defence — a soap story
Osbourn, A. (1996) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(96)80016-1 · Cited by 382
Self-citation
Cited by
Turner, T. R., James, E. K., & Poole, P. S. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-209 · Cited by 1,349
Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts
Stewart, M. P., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678 · Cited by 747
Fungal Resistance to Plant Antibiotics as a Mechanism of Pathogenesis
Morrissey, J. P., & Osbourn, A. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.3.708-724.1999 · Cited by 635
Self-citationBiosynthesis of Plant Isoprenoids: Perspectives for Microbial Engineering
Kirby, J., & Keasling, J. D. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.091955 · Cited by 478
Pentacyclic Triterpenoids from the Medicinal Herb, Centella asiatica (L.) Urban
James, J. T., & Dubery, I. A. (2009) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules14103922 · Cited by 399
Metadata
- Authors
- Papadopoulou, K., Melton, R. E., Leggett, M., Daniels, M. J., & Osbourn, A. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-10-26
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12923-12928
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2171240744
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compromised disease resistance in saponin-deficient plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.22.12923
- The paper
- Papadopoulou, K., Melton, R. E., Leggett, M., Daniels, M. J., & Osbourn, A. E. (1999). Compromised disease resistance in saponin-deficient plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.22.12923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.