Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Specific binding of proinsulin C-peptide to human cell membranes

Open access
Rigler, R., Pramanik, A., Jonasson, P., Kratz, G., Jansson, O. T., Nygren, P.-Å., Ståhl, S., Ekberg, K., Johansson, B.-L., Uhlén, S., Uhlén, M., Jörnvall, H., Wahren, J.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent reports have demonstrated beneficial effects of proinsulin C-peptide in the diabetic state, including improvements of kidney and nerve function. To examine the background to these effects, C-peptide binding to cell membranes has been studied by using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Measurements of ligand–membrane interactions at single-molecule detection sensitivity in 0.2-fl confocal volume elements show specific binding of fluorescently labeled C-peptide to several human cell types. Full saturation of the C-peptide binding to the cell surface is obtained at low nanomolar concentrations. Scatchard analysis of binding to renal tubular cells indicates the existence of a high-affinity binding process with K ass > 3.3 × 10 9 M −1 . Addition of excess unlabeled C-peptide is accompanied by competitive displacement, yielding a dissociation rate constant of 4.5 × 10 −4 s −1 . The C-terminal pentapeptide also displaces C-peptide bound to cell membranes, indicating that the binding occurs at this segment of the ligand. Nonnative d -C-peptide and a randomly scrambled C-peptide do not compete for binding with the labeled C-peptide, nor were crossreactions observed with insulin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, or proinsulin. Pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin, known to modify receptor-coupled G proteins, abolishes the binding. It is concluded that C-peptide binds to specific G protein-coupled receptors on human cell membranes, thus providing a molecular basis for its biological effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13318

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Rigler, R., Pramanik, A., Jonasson, P., Kratz, G., Jansson, O. T., Nygren, P.-Å., Ståhl, S., Ekberg, K., Johansson, B.-L., Uhlén, S., Uhlén, M., Jörnvall, H., & Wahren, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-11-09
Volume
96
Issue
23
Pages
13318-13323
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1979183493
Cited by
328
References
1
FWCI
18.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific binding of proinsulin C-peptide to human cell membranes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.23.13318
The paper
Rigler, R., Pramanik, A., Jonasson, P., Kratz, G., Jansson, O. T., Nygren, P.-Å., Ståhl, S., Ekberg, K., Johansson, B.-L., Uhlén, S., Uhlén, M., Jörnvall, H., & Wahren, J. (1999). Specific binding of proinsulin C-peptide to human cell membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.23.13318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.