The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Copper binding to the prion protein: Structural implications of four identical cooperative binding sites
Open accessAbstract
Evidence is growing to support a functional role for the prion protein (PrP) in copper metabolism. Copper ions appear to bind to the protein in a highly conserved octapeptide repeat region (sequence PHGGGWGQ) near the N terminus. To delineate the site and mode of binding of Cu(II) to the PrP, the copper-binding properties of peptides of varying lengths corresponding to 2-, 3-, and 4-octarepeat sequences have been probed by using various spectroscopic techniques. A two-octarepeat peptide binds a single Cu(II) ion with K d ≈ 6 μM whereas a four-octarepeat peptide cooperatively binds four Cu(II) ions. Circular dichroism spectra indicate a distinctive structuring of the octarepeat region on Cu(II) binding. Visible absorption, visible circular dichroism, and electron spin resonance spectra suggest that the coordination sphere of the copper is identical for 2, 3, or 4 octarepeats, consisting of a square-planar geometry with three nitrogen ligands and one oxygen ligand. Consistent with the pH dependence of Cu(II) binding, proton NMR spectroscopy indicates that the histidine residues in each octarepeat are coordinated to the Cu(II) ion. Our working model for the structure of the complex shows the histidine residues in successive octarepeats bridged between two copper ions, with both the Nɛ2 and Nδ1 imidazole nitrogen of each histidine residue coordinated and the remaining coordination sites occupied by a backbone amide nitrogen and a water molecule. This arrangement accounts for the cooperative nature of complex formation and for the apparent evolutionary requirement for four octarepeats in the PrP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sundberg, R. J., & Martin, R. B. (1974) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60290a003 · Cited by 1,147
Cited by
Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm
Wright, P. E., & Dyson, H. J. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3110 · Cited by 2,968
Self-citationMetals in Neurobiology: Probing Their Chemistry and Biology with Molecular Imaging
Que, E. L., Domaille, D. W., & Chang, C. J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr078203u · Cited by 2,061
Gaggelli, E., Kozlowski, H., Valensin, D., & Valensin, G. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040410w · Cited by 1,729
Cellular prion protein mediates impairment of synaptic plasticity by amyloid-β oligomers
Laurén, J., Gimbel, D. A., Nygaard, H. B., Gilbert, J. W., & Strittmatter, S. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07761 · Cited by 1,560
Bush, A. (2000) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(99)00073-3 · Cited by 731
Metadata
- Authors
- Viles, J. H., Cohen, F. E., Prusiner, S. B., Goodin, D. B., Wright, P. E., & Dyson, H. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-03-02
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2042-2047
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2068602112
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Copper binding to the prion protein: Structural implications of four identical cooperative binding sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.5.2042
- The paper
- Viles, J. H., Cohen, F. E., Prusiner, S. B., Goodin, D. B., Wright, P. E., & Dyson, H. J. (1999). Copper binding to the prion protein: Structural implications of four identical cooperative binding sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.5.2042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.