Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism of the cleavage specificity of Alzheimer’s disease γ-secretase identified by phenylalanine-scanning mutagenesis of the transmembrane domain of the amyloid precursor protein

Open access
Lichtenthaler, Stefan F., Wang, Rong, Grimm, Heike, Uljon, Sacha N., Masters, Colin L., Beyreuther, Konrad·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Proteolytic processing of the amyloid precursor protein by β-secretase yields A4CT (C99), which is cleaved further by the as yet unknown γ-secretase, yielding the β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide with 40 (Aβ 40 ) or 42 residues (Aβ 42 ). Because the position of γ-secretase cleavage is crucial for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease, we individually replaced all membrane-domain residues of A4CT outside the Aβ domain with phenylalanine, stably transfected the constructs in COS7 cells, and determined the effect of these mutations on the cleavage specificity of γ-secretase (Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 ratio). Compared with wild-type A4CT, mutations at Val-44, Ile-47, and Val-50 led to decreased Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 ratios, whereas mutations at Thr-43, Ile-45, Val-46, Leu-49, and Met-51 led to increased Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 ratios. A massive effect was observed for I45F (34-fold increase) making this construct important for the generation of animal models for Alzheimer’s disease. Unlike the other mutations, A4CT-V44F was processed mainly to Aβ 38 , as determined by mass spectrometry. Our data provide a detailed model for the active site of γ-secretase: γ-secretase interacts with A4CT by binding to one side of the α-helical transmembrane domain of A4CT. Mutations in the transmembrane domain of A4CT interfere with the interaction between γ-secretase and A4CT and, thus, alter the cleavage specificity of γ-secretase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3053

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Lichtenthaler, S. F., Wang, R., Grimm, H., Uljon, S. N., Masters, C. L., & Beyreuther, K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-03-16
Volume
96
Issue
6
Pages
3053-3058
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2146955477
Cited by
234
References
9
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of the cleavage specificity of Alzheimer’s disease γ-secretase identified by phenylalanine-scanning mutagenesis of the transmembrane domain of the amyloid precursor protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.6.3053
The paper
Lichtenthaler, S. F., Wang, R., Grimm, H., Uljon, S. N., Masters, C. L., & Beyreuther, K. (1999). Mechanism of the cleavage specificity of Alzheimer’s disease γ-secretase identified by phenylalanine-scanning mutagenesis of the transmembrane domain of the amyloid precursor protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.6.3053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.