The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular evidence for a relationship between LINE-1 elements and X chromosome inactivation: The Lyon repeat hypothesis
Open accessAbstract
X inactivation is a chromosome-specific form of genetic regulation in which thousands of genes on one homologue become silenced early in female embryogenesis. Although many aspects of X inactivation are now understood, the spread of the X inactivation signal along the entire length of the chromosome remains enigmatic. Extending the Gartler–Riggs model [Gartler, S. M. & Riggs, A. D. (1983) Annu. Rev. Genet. 17, 155–190], Lyon recently proposed [Lyon, M. F. (1998) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 80, 133–137] that a nonrandom organization of long interspersed element (LINE) repetitive sequences on the X chromosome might be responsible for its facultative heterochromatization. In this paper, we present data indicating that the LINE-1 (L1) composition of the human X chromosome is fundamentally distinct from that of human autosomes. The X chromosome is enriched 2-fold for L1 repetitive elements, with the greatest enrichment observed for a restricted subset of LINE-1 elements that were active <100 million years ago. Regional analysis of the X chromosome reveals that the most significant clustering of these elements is in Xq13–Xq21 (the center of X inactivation). Genomic segments harboring genes that escape inactivation are significantly reduced in L1 content compared with X chromosome segments containing genes subject to X inactivation, providing further support for the association between X inactivation and L1 content. These nonrandom properties of L1 distribution on the X chromosome provide strong evidence that L1 elements may serve as DNA signals to propagate X inactivation along the chromosome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females
Carrel, L., & Willard, H. F. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03479 · Cited by 2,097
Self-citationThe DNA sequence of the human X chromosome
Ross, M. T., Grafham, D. V., Coffey, A. J., Scherer, S., McLay, K., Muzny, D., Platzer, M., Howell, G. R., Burrows, C., Bird, C. P., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03440 · Cited by 1,129
Self-citationGenome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences
Broad Institute Genome Sequencing Platform, Mikkelsen, T. S., Broad Institute Whole Genome Assembly Team, Wakefield, M. J., Aken, B., Amemiya, C. T., Chang, J. L., Duke, S., Garber, M., Gentles, A. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05805 · Cited by 711
DNA methylation on N6-adenine in mammalian embryonic stem cells
Wu, T. P., Wang, T., Seetin, M. G., Lai, Y., Zhu, S., Lin, K., Liu, Y., Byrum, S. D., Mackintosh, S. G., Zhong, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17640 · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, J. A., Carrel, L., Chakravarti, A., & Eichler, E. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-06-06
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6634-6639
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2157701113
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular evidence for a relationship between LINE-1 elements and X chromosome inactivation: The Lyon repeat hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.12.6634
- The paper
- Bailey, J. A., Carrel, L., Chakravarti, A., & Eichler, E. E. (2000). Molecular evidence for a relationship between LINE-1 elements and X chromosome inactivation: The Lyon repeat hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.12.6634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.