The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The chimeric eukaryote: Origin of the nucleus from the karyomastigont in amitochondriate protists
Open accessAbstract
We present a testable model for the origin of the nucleus, the membrane-bounded organelle that defines eukaryotes. A chimeric cell evolved via symbiogenesis by syntrophic merger between an archaebacterium and a eubacterium. The archaebacterium, a thermoacidophil resembling extant Thermoplasma , generated hydrogen sulfide to protect the eubacterium, a heterotrophic swimmer comparable to Spirochaeta or Hollandina that oxidized sulfide to sulfur. Selection pressure for speed swimming and oxygen avoidance led to an ancient analogue of the extant cosmopolitan bacterial consortium “Thiodendron latens.” By eubacterial-archaebacterial genetic integration, the chimera, an amitochondriate heterotroph, evolved. This “earliest branching protist” that formed by permanent DNA recombination generated the nucleus as a component of the karyomastigont, an intracellular complex that assured genetic continuity of the former symbionts. The karyomastigont organellar system, common in extant amitochondriate protists as well as in presumed mitochondriate ancestors, minimally consists of a single nucleus, a single kinetosome and their protein connector. As predecessor of standard mitosis, the karyomastigont preceded free (unattached) nuclei. The nucleus evolved in karyomastigont ancestors by detachment at least five times (archamoebae, calonymphids, chlorophyte green algae, ciliates, foraminifera). This specific model of syntrophic chimeric fusion can be proved by sequence comparison of functional domains of motility proteins isolated from candidate taxa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
The Hydrogen Hypothesis for the First Eukaryote
Martin, W., & Müller, M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/32096 · Cited by 1,282
Cited by
Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges
Embley, T. M., & Martin, W. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04546 · Cited by 867
Endosymbiotic theories for eukaryote origin
Martin, W. F., Garg, S., & Zimorski, V. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0330 · Cited by 583
(2006) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-118 · Cited by 355
Endosymbiotic origin and differential loss of eukaryotic genes
Ku, C., Nelson-Sathi, S., Roettger, M., Sousa, F. L., Lockhart, P. J., Bryant, D., Hazkani-Covo, E., McInerney, J. O., Landan, G., & Martin, W. F. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14963 · Cited by 347
The archaeal ‘TACK’ superphylum and the origin of eukaryotes
Guy, L., & Ettema, T. J. G. (2011) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.09.002 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Margulis, L., Dolan, M. F., & Guerrero, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-06-20
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 6954-6959
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2105009146
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The chimeric eukaryote: Origin of the nucleus from the karyomastigont in amitochondriate protists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.13.6954
- The paper
- Margulis, L., Dolan, M. F., & Guerrero, R. (2000). The chimeric eukaryote: Origin of the nucleus from the karyomastigont in amitochondriate protists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.13.6954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.