The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correlation between plasmid content and infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi
Open accessAbstract
Infectivity-associated plasmids were identified in Borrelia burgdorferi B31 by using PCR to detect each of the plasmids in a panel of 19 clonal isolates. The clones exhibited high-, low-, and intermediate-infectivity phenotypes based on their frequency of isolation from needle-inoculated C3H/HeN mice. Presence or absence of 21 of the 22 plasmids was determined in each of the clones by using PCR primers specific for regions unique to each plasmid, as identified in the recently available genome sequence. Southern blot hybridization results were used to confirm the PCR results in some cases. Plasmid lp25 exhibited a direct correlation with infectivity in that it was consistently present in all clones of high or intermediate infectivity and was absent in all low-infectivity clones. lp28–1, containing the vmp -like sequence locus, also correlated with infectivity; all clones that lacked lp28–1 but contained lp25 had an intermediate infectivity phenotype, in which infection was primarily restricted to the joints. Plasmids cp9, cp32–3, lp21, lp28–2, lp28–4, and lp56 apparently are not required for infection in this model, because clones lacking these plasmids exhibited a high-infectivity phenotype. Plasmids cp26, cp32–1, cp32–2 and/or cp32–7, cp32–4, cp32–6, cp32–8, cp32–9, lp17, lp28–3, lp36, lp38, and lp54 were consistently present in all clones examined. On the basis of these results, lp25 and lp28–1 appear to encode virulence factors important in the pathogenesis of B. burgdorferi B31.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
Cited by
Revel, A. T., Talaat, A. M., & Norgard, M. V. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.032667699 · Cited by 332
Purser, J. E., Lawrenz, M. B., Caimano, M. J., Howell, J. K., Radolf, J. D., & Norris, S. J. (2003) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03452.x · Cited by 258
Self-citationXu, Q., Seemanapalli, S. V., Reif, K. E., Brown, C. R., & Liang, F. T. (2007) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.5109 · Cited by 55
(2023) · doi:10.1128/jb.00468-22 · Cited by 14
(2024) · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012327 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Purser, J. E., & Norris, S. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-12-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 13865-13870
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2114574473
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation between plasmid content and infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.25.13865
- The paper
- Purser, J. E., & Norris, S. J. (2000). Correlation between plasmid content and infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.25.13865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.