Cited by 388Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Microtubule-associated Protein/Microtubule Affinity-regulating Kinase (p110mark)

Open access
Meyer, Helmut E., Mandelkow, Eva-Maria, Drewes, Gerard, Trinczek, Bernhard, Illenberger, Susanne, Biernat, Jacek, Schmitt-Ulms, Gerold, Mandelkow, Eckhard·1995·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Aberrant phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau is one of the pathological features of neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer's disease. The phosphorylation of Ser-262 within the microtubule binding region of tau is of particular interest because so far it is observed only in Alzheimer's disease (Hasegawa, M., Morishima-Kawashima, M., Takio, K., Suzuki, M., Titani, K., and Ihara, Y. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 26, 17047-17054) and because phosphorylation of this site alone dramatically reduces the affinity for microtubules in vitro (Biernat, J., Gustke, N., Drewes, G., Mandelkow, E.-M., and Mandelkow, E. (1993) Neuron 11, 153-163). Here we describe the purification and characterization of a protein-serine kinase from brain tissue with an apparent molecular mass of 110 kDa on SDS gels. This kinase specifically phosphorylates tau on its KIGS or KCGS motifs in the repeat domain, whereas no significant phosphorylation outside this region was detected. Phosphorylation occurs mainly on Ser-262 located in the first repeat. This largely abolishes tau's binding to microtubules and makes them dynamically unstable, in contrast to other protein kinases that phosphorylate tau at or near the repeat domain. The data suggest a role for this novel kinase in cellular events involving rearrangement of the microtuble-associated proteins/microtubule arrays and their pathological degeneration in Alzheimer's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.270.13.7679

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 388

Authors
Meyer, H. E., Mandelkow, E.-M., Drewes, G., Trinczek, B., Illenberger, S., Biernat, J., Schmitt-Ulms, G., & Mandelkow, E.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Mandelkow, Eckhard
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-03
Volume
270
Issue
13
Pages
7679-7688
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1532265037
Cited by
388
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
tau phosphorylation, tau repeat domain, microtubule binding, microtubule dynamic instability, Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration, kinase purification
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Brain, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Cloning, Molecular, Escherichia coli, Humans, Kinetics, Microtubules, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptide Fragments, Peptide Mapping, Phosphopeptides, Phosphorylation, Phosphoserine, Recombinant Proteins, Serine, Swine, Trypsin, Tubulin, tau Proteins, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review