Cited by 302Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Amino-terminal Deletions Enhance Aggregation of β-Amyloid Peptides in Vitro

Open access
Pike, Christian J., Overman, Michael J., Cotman, Carl W.·1995·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

beta-Amyloid protein, which assembles into pathological aggregates deposited in Alzheimer's disease brain tissue, exhibits N-terminal heterogeneity both in vitro and in vivo. To investigate the effects of this N-terminal heterogeneity on the assembly characteristics and biophysical properties of beta-amyloid, we synthesized a series of peptides with progressively shortened N termini (initial residues at positions beta 1, beta 4, beta 8, beta 12, and beta 17) and C termini extending to residue beta 40 or beta 42. We report that peptides with N-terminal deletions exhibit enhanced peptide aggregation relative to full-length species, as quantitatively assessed by sedimentation analyses. Overall, sedimentation levels were greater for peptides terminating at residue beta 42 than for those terminating at residue beta 40. To determine if established biophysical features of the full-length protein were maintained in the truncated peptides, structural and bioactive properties of these peptides were examined and compared. Full-length and truncated peptides exhibiting aggregation showed circular dichroism spectra consistent with predominant beta-sheet conformation, fibrillar morphology under transmission electron microscopy, and significant toxicity in cultures of rat hippocampal neurons. These data demonstrate that N-terminal deletions enhance aggregation of beta-amyloid into neurotoxic, beta-sheet fibrils and suggest that such peptides may initiate and/or nucleate the pathological deposition of beta-amyloid.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.270.41.23895

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 302

Authors
Pike, C. J., Overman, M. J., & Cotman, C. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Pike, Christian J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
270
Issue
41
Pages
23895-23898
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065447152
Cited by
302
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01ag012663-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG12663)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Keywords
amyloid-beta, N-terminal truncation, peptide aggregation, Alzheimer's disease, β-sheet fibrils, neurotoxicity, hippocampal neurons, fibril nucleation, amyloid fibril formation, circular dichroism, transmission electron microscopy
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Cells, Cultured, Circular Dichroism, Embryo, Mammalian, Hippocampus, Humans, Indicators and Reagents, Microscopy, Electron, Neurons, Neurotoxins, Peptide Fragments, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Protein Structure, Secondary, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review