The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two Pathways for Base Excision Repair in Mammalian Cells
Open accessAbstract
Abasic sites (apurinic/apyrimidinic, AP sites) are the most common DNA lesions generated by both spontaneous and induced base loss. In a previous study we have shown that circular plasmid molecules containing multiple AP sites are efficiently repaired by Chinese hamster extracts in an in vitro repair assay. An average patch size of 6.6 nucleotides for a single AP site was calculated. To define the exact repair patch, a circular DNA duplex with a single AP site was constructed. The repair synthesis carried out by hamster and human cell extracts was characterized by restriction endonuclease analysis of the area containing the lesion. The results indicate that, besides the repair events involving the incorporation of a single nucleotide at the lesion site, repair synthesis occurred also 3' to the AP site and involved a repair patch of approximately 7 nucleotides. This alternative repair pathway was completely inhibited by the presence in the repair reaction of a polyclonal antibody raised against human proliferating cell nuclear antigen. These data give the first evidence that mammalian cell extracts repair natural AP sites by two distinct pathways: a single nucleotide gap filling reaction targeted at the AP site and a proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent pathway that removes a short oligonucleotide containing the abasic site and 3'-flanking nucleotides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excision of Deoxyribose Phosphate Residues by DNA Polymerase β During DNA Repair
Matsumoto, Y., & Kim, K. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7624801 · Cited by 683
Cited by
Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian DNA Repair and the DNA Damage Checkpoints
Sancar, A., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Ünsal-Kaçmaz, K., & Linn, S. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723 · Cited by 3,317
Advances in autism genetics: on the threshold of a new neurobiology
Abrahams, B. S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2346 · Cited by 1,866
Klungland, A. (1997) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/16.11.3341 · Cited by 788
Whitehouse, C. J., Taylor, R. M., Thistlethwaite, A., Zhang, H., Karimi-Busheri, F., Lasko, D. D., Weinfeld, M., & Caldecott, K. W. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00195-7 · Cited by 608
Evans, A. R., Limp-Foster, M., & Kelley, M. R. (2000) · Mutation Research/DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/s0921-8777(00)00046-x · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Frosina, G., Fortini, P., Rossi, O., Carrozzino, F., Raspaglio, G., Cox, L. S., Lane, D. P., Abbondandolo, A., & Dogliotti, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9573-9578
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012291005
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Pathways for Base Excision Repair in Mammalian Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.271.16.9573
- The paper
- Frosina, G., Fortini, P., Rossi, O., Carrozzino, F., Raspaglio, G., Cox, L. S., Lane, D. P., Abbondandolo, A., & Dogliotti, E. (1996). Two Pathways for Base Excision Repair in Mammalian Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.16.9573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.