The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cloning and Characterization of the Signal Transduction of Four Splice Variants of the Human Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase Activating Polypeptide Receptor
Open accessAbstract
Alternative splicing of two exons of the rat pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) receptor gene generates four major splice variants that are differentially expressed in specific tissues and variably coupled to intracellular second messengers. To evaluate the potential implications of these findings in human physiology, the human PACAP receptor gene was cloned. Alternative splicing about two exons of the gene allowed for four major splice variants that were subsequently identified on cDNA cloning. Each of the four splice variant cDNAs (null, SV-1, SV-2, and SV-3) was stably expressed in NIH/3T3 cells at similar receptor densities. For each splice variant, PACAP (both PACAP-38 and PACAP-27) had similar affinity and potency for stimulating either adenylate cyclase or phospholipase C. However, each receptor splice variant differed in their ligand-stimulated maximal response (efficacy) for total inositol phosphate accumulation with the SV-2 showing the greatest efficacy, followed by the null, SV-1, and SV-3 splice variants. Therefore, unlike the rat, PACAP binds and stimulates signal transduction with nearly equal affinity and potency for each of the receptor splice variants although with varying efficacy for the stimulation of phospholipase C. These results suggest a novel and potentially important mechanism for a single hormone to not only couple to dual signal transduction cascades but also elicit tissue-specific differential activation of phospholipase C in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berridge, M. J., Dawson, R. M. C., Downes, C. P., Heslop, J. P., & Irvine, R. F. (1983) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2120473 · Cited by 1,954
Cited by
Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide and Its Receptors: From Structure to Functions
Vaudry, D., Gonzalez, B. J., Basille, M., Yon, L., Fournier, A., & Vaudry, H. (2000) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01449-2 · Cited by 1,121
Neuronal Control of Skin Function: The Skin as a Neuroimmunoendocrine Organ
Roosterman, D., Goerge, T., Schneider, S. W., Bunnett, N. W., & Steinhoff, M. (2006) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00026.2005 · Cited by 665
VPAC and PAC receptors: From ligands to function
Dickson, L., & Finlayson, K. (2009) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.11.006 · Cited by 379
Kojro, E., Postina, R., Buro, C., Meiringer, C., Gehrig‐Burger, K., & Fahrenholz, F. (2006) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.05-4812fje · Cited by 118
Allostery and biased agonism at class B G protein-coupled receptors
Wootten, D., Miller, L. J., Koole, C., Christopoulos, A., & Sexton, P. M. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00049 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Pisegna, J. R., & Wank, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 17267-17274
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057431321
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloning and Characterization of the Signal Transduction of Four Splice Variants of the Human Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase Activating Polypeptide Receptor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.271.29.17267
- The paper
- Pisegna, J. R., & Wank, S. A. (1996). Cloning and Characterization of the Signal Transduction of Four Splice Variants of the Human Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase Activating Polypeptide Receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.29.17267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.