The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zn2+-stimulated Sphingomyelinase Is Secreted by Many Cell Types and Is a Product of the Acid Sphingomyelinase Gene
Open accessAbstract
Mammalian sphingomyelinases have been implicated in many important physiological and pathophysiological processes. Although several mammalian sphingomyelinases have been identified and studied, one of these, an acidic Zn2+-stimulated sphingomyelinase (Zn-SMase) originally found in fetal bovine serum, has received little attention since its first and only report 7 years ago. We now show that Zn-SMase activity is secreted by human and murine macrophages, human skin fibroblasts, microglial cells, and several other cells in culture and is markedly up-regulated during differentiation of human monocytes to macrophages. Remarkably, peritoneal macrophages from mice in which the acid SMase gene had been disrupted by homologous recombination secreted no Zn-SMase activity, indicating that this enzyme and the intracellular lysosomal SMase, which is Zn-independent, arise from the same gene. Furthermore, skin fibroblasts from patients with types A and B Niemann-Pick disease, which are known to lack lysosomal SMase activity, also lack Zn-SMase activity in their conditioned media. Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with a cDNA encoding lysosomal SMase massively overexpress both cellular lysosomal SMase and secreted Zn-SMase activities. Thus, Zn-SMase arises independently of alternative splicing, suggesting a post-translational process. In summary, a wide variety of cell types secrete Zn-SMase activity, which arises from the same gene as lysosomal SMase. This secreted enzyme may play roles in physiological and pathophysiological processes involving extracellular sphingomyelin hydrolysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A RAPID METHOD OF TOTAL LIPID EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION
Bligh, E. G., & Dyer, W. J. (1959) · Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1139/o59-099 · Cited by 54,751
The response of central glia to peripheral nerve injury
Svensson, M., Eriksson, P., Persson, J. K. E., Molander, C., Arvidsson, J., & Aldskogius, H. (1993) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0361-9230(93)90284-i · Cited by 97
Cited by
Adibhatla, R. M., & Hatcher, J. F. (2010) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2009.2668 · Cited by 480
Smith, E. L., & Schuchman, E. H. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.08-108043 · Cited by 213
Self-citationAcidification of the intimal fluid: the perfect storm for atherogenesis
Öörni, K., Rajamäki, K., Nguyen, S. D., Lähdesmäki, K., Plihtari, R., Lee-Rueckert, M., & Kovanen, P. T. (2015) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r050252 · Cited by 101
Sphingosine 1-phosphate is a key metabolite linking sphingolipids to glycerophospholipids
Kihara, A. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.08.014 · Cited by 65
Park, M. H., Jin, H. K., & Bae, J.-S. (2020) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-020-0399-8 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Schissel, S. L., Schuchman, E. H., Williams, K. J., & Tabas, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 18431-18436
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984745753
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.