Stat3 Recruitment by Two Distinct Ligand-induced, Tyrosine-phosphorylated Docking Sites in the Interleukin-10 Receptor Intracellular Domain
Open accessAbstract
Recent work has shown that IL-10 induces activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. To define the mechanism underlying signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) protein recruitment to the interleukin 10 (IL-10) receptor, the STAT proteins activated by IL-10 in different cell populations were first defined using electrophoretic mobility shift assays. In all cells tested, IL-10 activated Stat1 and Stat3 and induced the formation of three distinct DNA binding complexes that contained different combinations of these two transcription factors. IL-10 also activated Stat5 in Ba/F3 cells that stably expressed the murine IL-10 receptor. Using a structure-function mutagenesis approach, two tyrosine residues (Tyr427 and Tyr477) in the intracellular domain of the murine IL-10 receptor were found to be redundantly required for receptor function and for activation of Stat3 but not for Stat1 or Stat5. Twelve amino acid peptides encompassing either of these two tyrosine residues in phosphorylated form coprecipitated Stat3 but not Stat1 and blocked IL-10-induced Stat3 phosphorylation in a cell-free system. In contrast, tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides containing Tyr374 or Tyr396 did not interact with Stat3 or block Stat3 activation. These data demonstrate that Stat3 but not Stat1 or Stat5 is directly recruited to the ligand-activated IL-10 receptor by binding to specific but redundant receptor intracellular domain sequences containing phosphotyrosine. This study thus supports the concept that utilization of distinct STAT proteins by different cytokine receptors is dependent on the expression of particular ligand-activatable, tyrosine-containing STAT docking sites in receptor intracellular domains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FGF19 administration failed to induce hepatic expression of EGF, IL-10, IL-21, IL-22 and IL-31.
“In addition, FGF19 administration failed to induce hepatic expression of a panel of growth factors and cytokines associated with increased pSTAT3 signalling, including epidermal growth factor (EGF)31, IL-10 (ref. 32), IL-21 (ref. 33), IL-22 (ref. 34) and IL-31 (ref. 35)”
From Non-cell-autonomous activation of IL-6/STAT3 signaling mediates FGF19-driven hepatocarcinogenesis (2017) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 218
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Oswald, I. P., Wynn, T. A., Sher, A., and James, S. L. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 8676 -8680
- Rousset, F., Garcia, E., Defrance, T., Peronne, C., Vessio, N., Hsu, D-H., Kastelein, R., Moore, K. W., and Banchereau, J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 1890 -1893
- Ho, A. S. Y., Liu, Y., Khan, T. A., Hsu, D-H., Bazan, J. F., and Moore, K. W. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11267-11271
- Bazan, J. F. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6934 -6938
- Farrar, M. A., Campbell, J. D., and Schreiber, R. D. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11706 -11710
- Authors
- Weber-Nordt, R. M., Riley, J. K., Greenlund, A. C., Moore, K. W., Darnell, J. E., & Schreiber, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schreiber, Robert D.
- ORCID
- Schreiber, Robert D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 27954-27961
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069035291
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
- U.S. Public Health Service
- National Cancer Institute (CA-43059)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
- Keywords
- interleukin-10 receptor, STAT3, STAT1, STAT5, JAK/STAT signaling, tyrosine phosphorylation, ligand-induced receptor activation, receptor tyrosine kinase, cytokine receptor signaling, STAT3 phosphorylation
- MeSH terms
- Acute-Phase Proteins, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Binding Sites, Cell-Free System, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Ligands, Lymphocytes, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Peptide Fragments, Oligonucleotide Probes, Trans-Activators, Interleukin-10, Macrophages, Peritoneal, Receptors, Interleukin, Phosphotyrosine, STAT1 Transcription Factor, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice, Receptors, Interleukin-10
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review