Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of O-Linked Carbohydrate Chains in MUC-1 Mucin from Normal Breast Epithelial Cell Lines and Breast Carcinoma Cell Lines:

Open access
Lloyd, Kenneth O., Burchell, Joy, Kudryashov, Valery, Yin, Beatrice W.T., Taylor-Papadimitriou, Joyce·1996·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

MUC-1 mucin is considered to be aberrantly glycosylated in breast, ovary, and other carcinomas in comparison with mucin from corresponding normal tissues. In order to clarify these differences in glycosylation, we have compared the O-linked carbohydrate chains from MUC-1 immunoprecipitated from [3H]GlcN-labeled breast epithelial cell lines (MMSV1-1, MTSV1-7, and HB-2) derived from cells cultured from human milk, with three breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, BT-20, and T47D). Analysis by high pH anion chromatography showed that the normal cell lines had a higher ratio of GlcN/GalN and more complex oligosaccharide profiles than the cancer cell lines. Structural analyses were carried out on the oligosaccharides from MTSV1-7 and T47D MUC-1, and the following structures were proposed. MUC-1 from T47D had rather a simple glycosylation pattern, with NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-3GalNAc-ol, Galbeta1-3GalNAc-ol, and GalNAc-ol predominating; in contrast, MUC-1 from MTSV1-7 had more complex structures, including a number of disialo, core 2 species, i.e. NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAcbeta1-6[NeuAcalpha2 -3Galbeta1-3]GalNAc- ol and NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAcbeta1-6[NeuAcalpha2 -3Galbeta1-4GlcNAcbet a1-3Galbeta1-3]GalNAc-ol. Double-labeling experiments with [3H]GlcN and 14C-aminoacids and analysis of GalNAc or GalNAc-ol:protein ratios in MUC-1 showed that there was also a significant difference in the degree of glycosylation of the mucin between the two cell types. We conclude that MUC-1 from breast cancer cell lines has simpler, and fewer, carbohydrate chains than MUC-1 from normal breast epithelial cells, and that these differences, combined or separately, explain the differential tumor specificity of some MUC-1 antibodies and T cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.271.52.33325

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lloyd, K. O., Burchell, J., Kudryashov, V., Yin, B. W. T., & Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
271
Issue
52
Pages
33325-33334
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018978714
Cited by
362
References
0
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.