The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Functional Analysis of Nodulin 26, an Aquaporin in Soybean Root Nodule Symbiosomes
Open accessAbstract
Upon infection of soybean roots, nitrogen-fixing bacteria become enclosed in a specific organelle known as the symbiosome. The symbiosome membrane (SM) is a selectively permeable barrier that controls metabolite flux between the plant cytosol and the symbiotic bacterium inside. Nodulin 26 (NOD 26), a member of the aquaporin (AQP) water channel family, is a major protein component of the SM. Expression of NOD 26 in Xenopus oocytes gave a mercury-sensitive increase in osmotic water permeability (Pf). To define the biophysical properties of NOD 26 water channels in their native membranes, symbiosomes were isolated from soybean root nodules and the SM separated as vesicles from the bacteria. Permeabilities were measured using stopped-flow fluorimetry in SM vesicles with entrapped carboxyfluorescein. Osmotic water permeability (Pf) of SM was high, with a value of 0.05 +/- 0.003 cm/s observed at 20 degrees C (mean +/- S.E.; n = 15). Water flow exhibited a low activation energy, was inhibited by HgCl2 (0.1 mM), and exhibited a unit conductance of 3.2 +/- 1.3 x 10(-15) cm3/s, a value 30-fold lower than that of AQP 1, the red blood cell water channel. Diffusive water permeability (Pd) was 0.0024 +/- 0.0002 cm/s, and the resulting Pf to Pd ratio was 18.3, indicating that water crosses the SM in single file fashion via the NOD 26 water channel. In addition to high water permeability, SM vesicles also show high mercury-sensitive permeability to glycerol and formamide, but not urea, suggesting that NOD 26 also fluxes these solutes. Overall, we conclude that NOD 26 acts as a water channel with a single channel conductance that is 30-fold lower than AQP 1. Because the solutes that permeate NOD 26 are far larger than water, and water appears to cross the channel via a single file pathway, solute flux across NOD 26 appears to occur by a pathway that is distinct from that for water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant Aquaporins: Membrane Channels with Multiple Integrated Functions
Maurel, C., Verdoucq, L., Luu, D.-T., & Santoni, V. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092734 · Cited by 1,280
Cellular and Molecular Biology of the Aquaporin Water Channels
Borgnia, M., Nielsen, S., Engel, A., & Agre, P. (1999) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.425 · Cited by 846
Johanson, U., Karlsson, M., Johansson, I., Gustavsson, S., Sjövall, S., Fraysse, L., Weig, A. R., & Kjellbom, P. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.126.4.1358 · Cited by 771
Plant aquaporins: multifunctional water and solute channels with expanding roles
Tyerman, S. D., Niemietz, C. M., & Bramley, H. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00791.x · Cited by 638
Chemical root to shoot signaling under drought
Schachtman, D. P., & Goodger, J. Q. D. (2008) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.04.003 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Rivers, R. L., Dean, R. M., Chandy, G., Hall, J. E., Roberts, D. M., & Zeidel, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 16256-16261
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004779654
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Analysis of Nodulin 26, an Aquaporin in Soybean Root Nodule Symbiosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.272.26.16256
- The paper
- Rivers, R. L., Dean, R. M., Chandy, G., Hall, J. E., Roberts, D. M., & Zeidel, M. L. (1997). Functional Analysis of Nodulin 26, an Aquaporin in Soybean Root Nodule Symbiosomes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.26.16256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.