Cited by 180Nitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Decreased nitric-oxide synthase activity causes impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation in the postischemic heart

Open access
Giraldez, Roberto R., Panda, Alexander, Xia, Yong, Sanders, Scherer P., Zweier, Jay L.·1997·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) is an important regulator of endothelial function and vascular tone in biological tissues. While endothelial dysfunction occurs following ischemia and has been attributed to altered NO. formation, the biochemical basis for this dysfunction is unknown. Therefore, studies were performed to determine the effects of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion on eNOS in isolated rat hearts subjected to periods of global ischemia or ischemia followed by reperfusion. eNOS activity was assayed by L-[14C]arginine to L-[14C]citrulline conversion and alterations in the amount and distribution of eNOS determined by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. While activity was preserved after 30 min of ischemia with a value of 1.1 +/- 0.1 pmol x min-1 x mg of protein-1, it decreased by 77% after 60 min and became nearly undetectable after 120 min. Reperfusion resulted in only a partial restoration of activity. The decline in activity with ischemia was due, in part, to a loss of eNOS protein. Hemodynamic studies showed that the onset of impaired vascular reactivity paralleled the loss of functional eNOS. Subjecting isolated eNOS to conditions of acidosis, which occur during ischemia, followed by restoration of pH as occurs on reperfusion, caused a combination of reversible and irreversible loss of activity similar to that seen in ischemic and reperfused hearts. Thus, loss of endothelial function following ischemia is paralleled by a loss of eNOS activity due to a combination of pH-dependent denaturation and proteolysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.272.34.21420

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reports for the maximum rate of NO production by NOS vary from 1 nM/s to 70 μM/s.

    “Unfortunately, the reports for the maximum rate of NO production by NOS vary from 1 nM/s to 70 μM/s [39–41].”

    From Mechanisms of nitrite bioactivation (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 180

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Pollock, J. S., Forstermann, U., Mitchell, J. A., Warner, T. D., Schmidt, H. H. H. W., Nakane, M., and Murad, F. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  2. Bredt, D. S., and Snyder, S. H. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 682-685
  3. Forstermann, U., Pollock, J. S., Schmidt, H. H. H. W., Heller, M., and Murad, F. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1788 -1792
  4. Bredt, D. S., and Snyder, S. H. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 9030 -33
  5. Xia, Y., Dawson, V. L., Dawson, T. M., Snyder, S. H., and Zweier, J. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6770 -6774
  6. Sessa, W. C., Hecker, M., Mitchel, J. A., and Vane, J. R. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 8607-8611

Authors
Giraldez, R. R., Panda, A., Xia, Y., Sanders, S. P., & Zweier, J. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Zweier, Jay L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-08
Volume
272
Issue
34
Pages
21420-21426
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974235853
Cited by
180
References
32
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HL38324)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-38324, HL52315, P50HL052315)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
endothelial nitric oxide synthase, myocardial ischemia, ischemia-reperfusion injury, endothelial dysfunction, endothelium-dependent relaxation, nitric oxide, acidosis, protein denaturation, proteolysis, isolated rat heart, vascular reactivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Endothelium, Vascular, Enzyme Inhibitors, Female, Histamine, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Time Factors, Vasodilation, Vasodilator Agents, Blotting, Western, Reperfusion Injury, Myocardial Ischemia, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nitric Oxide Synthase, NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review