Molecular Basis for the Progeroid Variant of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
Open accessAbstract
Progeroid type Ehlers-Danlos (E-D) syndrome was reported to be caused by defects in galactosyltransferase I (EC 2.4.1.133), which is involved in the synthesis of common linkage regions of proteoglycans. Recently, we isolated cDNA of the galactosyltransferase I (XGalT-1) (Okajima, T., Yoshida, K., Kondo, T., and Furukawa, K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22915-22918). Therefore, we analyzed mutations in this gene of a patient with progeroid type E-D syndrome by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing. Two changes of G and T to A and C at 186 and 206, respectively, were detected. Then, we determined the genomic DNA sequences encompassing the A186D and L206P mutations, revealing that the unaffected parents and two siblings were heterozygous for either one of the two different mutations and normal, while the patient had both of two different mutant genes. Enzymatic functions of cDNA clones of XGalT-1 containing the individual mutations were examined, elucidating that L206P clone completely lost the activity, while A186D retained approximately 50% or 10% of the activity when analyzed with extracts from cDNA transfectant cells or recombinant soluble enzymes, respectively. Moreover, L206P enzyme showed diffuse staining in the cytoplasm of transfectant cells, while the wild type or A186D clones showed Golgi pattern. These results indicated that the mutations in XGalT-1 were at least one of main molecular basis for progeroid type E-D syndrome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This defective proteoglycan biosynthesis was shown to result from biallelic mutations in B4GALT7, encoding galactosyltransferase I.
“This defective proteoglycan biosynthesis was shown to result from biallelic mutations in B4GALT7, encoding galactosyltransferase I [Quentin et al., 1990;Okajima et al., 1999].”
From The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes, rare types (2017) · cites this paper as Okajima et al., 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 157
- Authors
- Okajima, T., Fukumoto, S., Furukawa, K., Urano, T., & Furukawa, K.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Nagasaki University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Furukawa, Koichi
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 28841-28844
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013124058
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (10470029)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
- Keywords
- proteoglycan synthesis, compound heterozygosity, enzyme activity loss, Golgi localization, cDNA cloning, glycosylation
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cloning, Molecular, DNA Mutational Analysis, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Galactosyltransferases, Cricetinae, Heterozygote, Humans, L Cells, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Progeria, Transfection, Sequence Alignment, CHO Cells, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review