Cited by 207DNA Repair MechanismsBRCA gene mutations in cancerPARP inhibition in cancer therapy

Expression of BRC Repeats in Breast Cancer Cells Disrupts the BRCA2-Rad51 Complex and Leads to Radiation Hypersensitivity and Loss of G2/M Checkpoint Control

Open access
Chen, Chi-Fen, Chen, Phang-Lang, Zhong, Qing, Sharp, Z. Dave, Lee, Wen-Hwa·1999·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

BRCA2 is a breast tumor suppressor with a potential function in the cellular response to DNA damage. BRCA2 binds to Rad51 through its BRC repeats. In support of the biological significance of this interaction, we found that the complex of BRCA2 and Rad51 in breast cancer MCF-7 cells was diminished upon conditional expression of a wild-type, but not a mutated, BRC4 repeat using the tetracycline-inducible system. Cells expressing a wild-type BRC4 repeat showed hypersensitivity to gamma-irradiation, an inability to form Rad51 radiation-induced foci, and a failure of radiation-induced G(2)/M, but not G(1)/S, checkpoint control. These results strongly suggest that the interaction between BRCA2 and Rad51 mediated by BRC repeats is critical for the cellular response to DNA damage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.274.46.32931

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • H-bond staples are not unique to MAPKAPK docking regions bound to MAPKs and are also used in other linear motif based interaction systems such as TGFβ signaling and DNA repair regulation.

    “H-bond staples, however, are not unique to MAPKAPK docking regions bound to MAPKs and are also used in other linear motif based interaction systems such as those operating in TGFβ signaling (the TGFβ effector SMAD3 interacts with a linear motif in the adaptor SARA) or in DNA repair regulation (the DNA recombinase RAD51 interacts with a short peptide segment from the scaffold protein BRCA2 ) (39-41”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 207

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Rajan, J. V., Wang, M., Marquis, S. T., and Chodosh, L. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13078 -13083
  2. Chen, P. L., Chen, C. F., Chen, Y., Xiao, J., Sharp, Z. D., and Lee, W. H. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5287-5292
  3. Mizuta, R., LaSalle, J. M., Cheng, H. L., Shinohara, A., Ogawa, H., Copeland, N., Jenkins, N. A., Lalande, M., and Alt, F. W. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  4. Tsuzuki, T., Fujii, Y., Sakumi, K., Tominaga, Y., Nakao, K., Sekiguchi, M., Yoshimura, Y., and Morita, T. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6236 -6240
  5. Shan, B., Durfee, T., and Lee, W. H. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 679 -684
  6. Vidal, M., Braun, P., Chen, E., Boeke, J. D., and Harlow, E. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10321-10326
  7. Gossen, M., and Bujard, H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 5547-5551
  8. Kuerbitz, S. J., Plunkett, B. S., Walsh, W. V., and Kastan, M. B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7491-7495

Authors
Chen, C.-F., Chen, P.-L., Zhong, Q., Sharp, Z. D., & Lee, W.-H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Wen-Hwa
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
274
Issue
46
Pages
32931-32935
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989802855
Cited by
207
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Susan G. Komen for the Cure
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 58183, P01CA030195, CA-30195, P50CA058183)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Keywords
BRCA2, RAD51, BRC repeats, breast cancer, MCF-7 cells, radiation hypersensitivity, gamma irradiation, DNA damage response, G2/M checkpoint, RAD51 foci, tetracycline-inducible expression
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Cycle, Clone Cells, DNA Damage, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gamma Rays, Humans, Luminescent Proteins, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Mitosis, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Protein Binding, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Tetracycline, Transcription Factors, Tumor Cells, Cultured, G2 Phase, S Phase, BRCA2 Protein, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Rad51 Recombinase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review