Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

β(1,2)-Xylose and α(1,3)-Fucose Residues Have a Strong Contribution in IgE Binding to Plant Glycoallergens

Open access
van Ree, Ronald, Cabanes-Macheteau, Marion, Akkerdaas, Jaap, Milazzo, Jean-Pierre, Loutelier-Bourhis, Corinne, Rayon, Catherine, Villalba, Mayte, Koppelman, Stef, Aalberse, Rob, Rodriguez, Rosalia, Faye, Loı̈c, Lerouge, Patrice·2000·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Primary structures of the N-glycans of two major pollen allergens (Lol p 11 and Ole e 1) and a major peanut allergen (Ara h 1) were determined. Ole e 1 and Ara h 1 carried high mannose and complex N-glycans, whereas Lol p 11 carried only the complex. The complex structures all had a beta(1,2)-xylose linked to the core mannose. Substitution of the proximal N-acetylglucosamine with an alpha(1, 3)-fucose was observed on Lol p 11 and a minor fraction of Ole e 1 but not on Ara h 1. To elucidate the structural basis for IgE recognition of plant N-glycans, radioallergosorbent test analysis with protease digests of the three allergens and a panel of glycoproteins with known N-glycan structures was performed. It was demonstrated that both alpha(1,3)-fucose and beta(1,2)-xylose are involved in IgE binding. Surprisingly, xylose-specific IgE antibodies that bound to Lol p 11 and bromelain did not recognize closely related xylose-containing structures on horseradish peroxidase, phytohemeagglutinin, Ole e 1, and Ara h 1. On Lol p 11 and bromelain, the core beta-mannose is substituted with just an alpha(1,6)-mannose. On the other xylose-containing N-glycans, an additional alpha(1,3)-mannose is present. These observations indicate that IgE binding to xylose is sterically hampered by the presence of an alpha(1,3)-antenna.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11451

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
van Ree, R., Cabanes-Macheteau, M., Akkerdaas, J., Milazzo, J.-P., Loutelier-Bourhis, C., Rayon, C., Villalba, M., Koppelman, S., Aalberse, R., Rodriguez, R., Faye, L., & Lerouge, P.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
275
Issue
15
Pages
11451-11458
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132177439
Cited by
388
References
2
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: β(1,2)-Xylose and α(1,3)-Fucose Residues Have a Strong Contribution in IgE Binding to Plant Glycoallergens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.275.15.11451
The paper
van Ree, R., Cabanes-Macheteau, M., Akkerdaas, J., Milazzo, J.-P., Loutelier-Bourhis, C., Rayon, C., Villalba, M., Koppelman, S., Aalberse, R., Rodriguez, R., Faye, L., & Lerouge, P. (2000). β(1,2)-Xylose and α(1,3)-Fucose Residues Have a Strong Contribution in IgE Binding to Plant Glycoallergens. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.15.11451

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.