The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proteomic Analysis of Nucleoporin Interacting Proteins
Open accessAbstract
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae nuclear pore complex is a supramolecular assembly of 30 nucleoporins that cooperatively facilitate nucleocytoplasmic transport. Thirteen nucleoporins that contain FG peptide repeats (FG Nups) are proposed to function as stepping stones in karyopherin-mediated transport pathways. Here, protein interactions that occur at individual FG Nups were sampled using immobilized nucleoporins and yeast extracts. We find that many proteins bind to FG Nups in highly reproducible patterns. Among 135 proteins identified by mass spectrometry, most were karyopherins and nucleoporins. The PSFG nucleoporin Nup42p and the GLFG nucleoporins Nup49p, Nup57p, Nup100p, and Nup116p exhibited generic interactions with karyopherins; each bound 6--10 different karyopherin betas, including importins as well as exportins. Unexpectedly, the same Nups also captured the hexameric Nup84p complex and Nup2p. In contrast, the FXFG nucleoporins Nup1p, Nup2p, and Nup60p were more selective and captured mostly the Kap95p.Kap60p heterodimer. When the concentration of Gsp1p-GTP was elevated in the extracts to mimic the nucleoplasmic environment, the patterns of interacting proteins changed; exportins exhibited enhanced binding to FG Nups, and importins exhibited reduced binding. The results demonstrate a global role for Gsp1p-GTP on karyopherin-nucleoporin interactions and provide a rudimentary map of the routes that karyopherins take as they cross the nuclear pore complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Nuclear Pore Complex and Nuclear Transport
Wente, S. R., & Rout, M. P. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000562 · Cited by 686
Natively Unfolded Nucleoporins Gate Protein Diffusion across the Nuclear Pore Complex
Patel, S. S., Belmont, B. J., Sante, J. M., & Rexach, M. F. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.044 · Cited by 566
Self-citationDisorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded
Denning, D. P., Patel, S. S., Uversky, V., Fink, A. L., & Rexach, M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0437902100 · Cited by 503
Self-citationThe Nuclear Pore Complex as a Flexible and Dynamic Gate
Knockenhauer, K. E., & Schwartz, T. U. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.034 · Cited by 406
Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases
Smolka, M. B., Albuquerque, C. P., Chen, S.-H., & Zhou, H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701622104 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, N. P. C., Huang, L., Burlingame, A., & Rexach, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 276
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 29268-29274
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059569036
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic Analysis of Nucleoporin Interacting Proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m102629200
- The paper
- Allen, N. P. C., Huang, L., Burlingame, A., & Rexach, M. (2001). Proteomic Analysis of Nucleoporin Interacting Proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m102629200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.