Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification and Characterization of Novel Mammalian Neuropeptide FF-like Peptides That Attenuate Morphine-induced Antinociception

Open access
Liu, Qingyun, Guan, Xiao-Ming, Martin, William J., McDonald, Terrence P., Clements, Michelle K., Jiang, Qingping, Zeng, Zhizhen, Jacobson, Marlene, Williams, David L., Yu, Hong, Bomford, Douglas, Figueroa, David, Mallee, John, Wang, Ruiping, Evans, Jilly, Gould, Robert, Austin, Christopher P.·2001·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The two mammalian neuropeptides NPFF and NPAF have been shown to have important roles in nociception, anxiety, learning and memory, and cardiovascular reflex. Two receptors (FF1 and FF2) have been molecularly identified for NPFF and NPAF. We have now characterized a novel gene designated NPVF that encodes two neuropeptides highly similar to NPFF. NPVF mRNA was detected specifically in a region between the dorsomedial and ventromedial hypothalamic nuclei. NPVF-derived peptides displayed higher affinity for FF1 than NPFF-derived peptides, but showed poor agonist activity for FF2. Following intracerebral ventricular administration, a NPVF-derived peptide blocked morphine-induced analgesia more potently than NPFF in both acute and inflammatory models of pain. In situ hybridization analysis revealed distinct expression patterns of FF1 and FF2 in the rat central nervous system. FF1 was broadly distributed, with the highest levels found in specific regions of the limbic system and the brainstem where NPVF-producing neurons were shown to project. FF2, in contrast, was mostly expressed in the spinal cord and some regions of the thalamus. These results indicate that the endogenous ligands for FF1 and FF2 are NPVF- and NPFF-derived peptides, respectively, and suggest that the NPVF/FF1 system may be an important part of endogenous anti-opioid mechanism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m105308200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Q., Guan, X.-M., Martin, W. J., McDonald, T. P., Clements, M. K., Jiang, Q., Zeng, Z., Jacobson, M., Williams, D. L., Yu, H., Bomford, D., Figueroa, D., Mallee, J., Wang, R., Evans, J., Gould, R., & Austin, C. P.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
276
Issue
40
Pages
36961-36969
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113887382
Cited by
260
References
1
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification and Characterization of Novel Mammalian Neuropeptide FF-like Peptides That Attenuate Morphine-induced Antinociception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m105308200
The paper
Liu, Q., Guan, X.-M., Martin, W. J., McDonald, T. P., Clements, M. K., Jiang, Q., Zeng, Z., Jacobson, M., Williams, D. L., Yu, H., Bomford, D., Figueroa, D., Mallee, J., Wang, R., Evans, J., Gould, R., & Austin, C. P. (2001). Identification and Characterization of Novel Mammalian Neuropeptide FF-like Peptides That Attenuate Morphine-induced Antinociception. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m105308200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.