Cited by 69

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Characterization of the Role of the “MT-loop”

English, William R., Holtz, Béatrice, Vogt, Gavin, Knäuper, Vera, Murphy, Gillian·2001·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m107783200

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weaver et al. reported that the MT-loop, together with the hemopexin domain, is required for the translocation of MT1-MMP from the apical to the basal membrane in polarized epithelial cells during tubulogenesis, but deletion of the entire MT-loop has no significant effect on the expression, trafficking, processing, or the proteolytic activity of MT1-MMP.

    “Weaver et al. reported that the MT-loop, together with the hemopexin domain, is required for the translocation of MT1-MMP from the apical to the basal membrane in polarized epithelial cells during tubulogenesis (65), but deletion of the entire MT-loop has no significant effect on the expression, trafficking, processing, or the proteolytic activity of MT1-MMP (61, 66).”

    From Identification of amino acid residues in the MT-loop of MT1-MMP critical for its ability to cleave low-density lipoprotein receptor (2022) · cites this paper as [66]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Werb, 1997, Cell, 91, 439, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80429-8 · DOI
  2. Murphy, 2000, Fibrinolysis Proteolysis, 14, 165, 10.1054/fipr.2000.0068 · DOI
  3. Sang, 1998, Cell Res., 8, 171, 10.1038/cr.1998.17 · DOI
  4. Ellerbroek, 1999, Bioessays, 21, 940, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199911)21:11<940::AID-BIES6>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  5. Nagase, 1998, Cell Res., 8, 179, 10.1038/cr.1998.18 · DOI
  6. Ha, 2001, Cancer Res., 61, 984
  7. Sato, 1994, Nature, 370, 61, 10.1038/370061a0 · DOI
  8. Nakahara, 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 94, 7959, 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7959 · DOI
  9. Lehti, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 15006, 10.1074/jbc.M910220199 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Butler, 1997, Eur. J. Biochem., 244, 653, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00653.x · DOI
  11. Shofuda, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 9749, 10.1074/jbc.272.15.9749 · DOI
  12. Llano, 1999, Cancer Res., 59, 2570
  13. Butler, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 871, 10.1074/jbc.273.2.871 · DOI · Paper page
  14. D'Ortho, 1997, Eur. J. Biochem., 250, 751, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00751.x · DOI
  15. Hiraoka, 1998, Cell, 95, 365, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81768-7 · DOI
  16. Holmbeck, 1999, Cell, 99, 81, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80064-1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Zhou, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 4052, 10.1073/pnas.060037197 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Itoh, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 34260, 10.1074/jbc.274.48.34260 · DOI
  19. Kojima, 2000, FEBS Lett., 480, 142, 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01919-0 · DOI
  20. English, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 14046, 10.1074/jbc.275.19.14046 · DOI
  21. English, 2001, FEBS Lett., 491, 137, 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02150-0 · DOI
  22. Velasco, 2000, Cancer Res., 60, 877
  23. Fernandez-Catalan, 1998, EMBO J., 17, 5238, 10.1093/emboj/17.17.5238 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Gill, 1989, Anal. Biochem., 182, 319, 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90602-7 · DOI
  25. Murphy, 1995, Methods Enzymol., 248, 496, 10.1016/0076-6879(95)48032-3 · DOI
  26. Mucha, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 2763, 10.1074/jbc.273.5.2763 · DOI
  27. Holtz, 1999, Biochemistry, 38, 12174, 10.1021/bi990876m · DOI
  28. Eisenthal, 1974, Biochem. J., 139, 715, 10.1042/bj1390715 · DOI
  29. Cornish-Bowden, 1974, Biochem. J., 139, 721, 10.1042/bj1390721 · DOI
  30. Butler, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 20391, 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20391 · DOI
  31. Morrison, 1998, Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol., 61, 201
  32. Williams, 1979, Biochemistry, 18, 2567, 10.1021/bi00579a021 · DOI
  33. Ward, 1991, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1079, 242, 10.1016/0167-4838(91)90132-J · DOI
  34. Zhang, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 8015, 10.1074/jbc.271.14.8015 · DOI
  35. Will, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 17119, 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17119 · DOI
  36. Overall, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 39497, 10.1074/jbc.M005932200 · DOI
  37. Morgunova, 1999, Science, 284, 1667, 10.1126/science.284.5420.1667 · DOI
  38. Miyamori, 2000, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 267, 796, 10.1006/bbrc.1999.2050 · DOI
  39. Terp, 2000, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 17, 933, 10.1080/07391102.2000.10506582 · DOI
  40. Miyamori, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 28204, 10.1074/jbc.M103083200 · DOI
  41. Lehti, 1998, Biochem. J., 334, 345, 10.1042/bj3340345 · DOI
  42. Stanton, 1998, J. Cell Sci., 111, 2789, 10.1242/jcs.111.18.2789 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
English, W. R., Holtz, B., Vogt, G., Knäuper, V., & Murphy, G.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
276
Issue
45
Pages
42018-42026
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
69
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review