Cited by 61Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsProtein Structure and DynamicsATP Synthase and ATPases Research

The Role of ATP Hydrolysis for Kinesin Processivity

Open access
Farrell, Christopher M., Mackey, Andrew T., Klumpp, Lisa M., Gilbert, Susan P.·2002·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Conventional kinesin is a highly processive, plus-end-directed microtubule-based motor that drives membranous organelles toward the synapse in neurons. Although recent structural, biochemical, and mechanical measurements are beginning to converge into a common view of how kinesin converts the energy from ATP turnover into motion, it remains difficult to dissect experimentally the intermolecular domain cooperativity required for kinesin processivity. We report here our pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of a kinesin switch I mutant at Arg(210) (NXXSSRSH, residues 205-212 in Drosophila kinesin). The results show that the R210A substitution results in a dimeric kinesin that is defective for ATP hydrolysis and a motor that cannot detach from the microtubule although ATP binding and microtubule association occur. We propose a mechanistic model in which ATP binding at head 1 leads to the plus-end-directed motion of the neck linker to position head 2 forward at the next microtubule binding site. However, ATP hydrolysis is required at head 1 to lock head 2 onto the microtubule in a tight binding state before head 1 dissociation from the microtubule. This mechanism optimizes forward movement and processivity by ensuring that one motor domain is tightly bound to the microtubule before the second can detach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m108793200

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct measurements show that kh is ∼100 s−1 for dimeric constructs and considerably faster for monomers, with estimates placing it at >250 s−1.

    “Direct measurements using chemical quench methods have consistently shown that, althoughkh is ∼100 s−1 for dimeric constructs, it is considerably faster for monomers, with estimates placing it at >250 s−1 (2”

    From Stepping and Stretching (2003) · cites this paper as [22]

    Table I (section labeled Fig. 2; page unavailable) lists an acid-quench rate of 100 s−1 for K401-wt, supporting the approximate rate for the dimeric construct. The paper’s Fig. 6 caption reports quench measurements for K401-wt and R210A, but the retrieved passages do not give a monomer hydrolysis estimate above 250 s−1 or establish the claimed dimer–monomer comparison. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hackney, D. D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91, 6865-6869
  2. Moyer, M. L. (1998) Mechanism of the Microtubule Kinesin Motor ATPase, Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 22.
  3. Onishi, H., Kojima, S.-I., Katoh, K., Fujiwara, K., Martinez, H. M., and Morales, M. F. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 6653-6658

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farrell, C. M., Mackey, A. T., Klumpp, L. M., & Gilbert, S. P.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Gilbert, Susan P.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
277
Issue
19
Pages
17079-17087
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155004688
Cited by
61
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM054141, GM-54141)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
Keywords
kinesin, ATP hydrolysis, processivity, microtubule motor proteins, ATP binding, microtubule binding, neck linker, pre-steady-state kinetics
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphatases, Adenosine Triphosphate, Adenylyl Imidodiphosphate, Animals, Arginine, Binding Sites, Brain, Cattle, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Hydrolysis, Kinetics, Microtubules, Models, Biological, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Binding, Time Factors, Tubulin, Kinesins, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review