Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accessibility of Cholesterol in Endoplasmic Reticulum Membranes and Activation of SREBP-2 Switch Abruptly at a Common Cholesterol Threshold

Sokolov, Anna, Radhakrishnan, Arun·2010·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m110.148254

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Branched (DPhyPC) and more unsaturated (DOPC) acyl chains lower the tendency to form ordered conformations in the membrane, and thus, POPC has the strongest cholesterol sequestration effect, followed by DOPC and DPhyPC.

    “Branched (DPhyPC) and more unsaturated (DOPC) acyl chains lower the tendency to form ordered conformations in the membrane, and thus, POPC has the strongest cholesterol sequestration effect, followed by DOPC and DPhyPC (Sokolov & Radhakrishnan, 2010).”
  • Phospholipid acyl chain saturation has profound effects on the accessibility of cholesterol in membranes.

    “In addition to sphingomyelin, phospholipid acyl chain saturation has profound effects on the accessibility of cholesterol in membranes (Radhakrishnan & McConnell, 2000; Sokolov & Radhakrishnan, 2010; Lange et al, 2013; Gay et al, 2015; Chakrabarti et al, 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Farrand, 2010, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, 4341
  2. Rosenbaum, 2010, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, 5477
  3. Radhakrishnan, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102, 12662
  4. Radhakrishnan, 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 6511
  5. McConnell, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103, 1184

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sokolov, A., & Radhakrishnan, A.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
285
Issue
38
Pages
29480-29490
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
105
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review