The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sialylation of the Fas Death Receptor by ST6Gal-I Provides Protection against Fas-mediated Apoptosis in Colon Carcinoma Cells
Open accessAbstract
The glycosyltransferase, ST6Gal-I, adds sialic acid in an α2-6 linkage to the N-glycans of membrane and secreted glycoproteins. Up-regulation of ST6Gal-I occurs in many cancers, including colon carcinoma, and correlates with metastasis and poor prognosis. However, mechanisms by which ST6Gal-I facilitates tumor progression remain poorly understood due to limited knowledge of enzyme substrates. Herein we identify the death receptor, Fas (CD95), as an ST6Gal-I substrate, and show that α2-6 sialylation of Fas confers protection against Fas-mediated apoptosis. Intriguingly, differences in ST6Gal-I activity do not affect the function of DR4 or DR5 death receptors upon treatment with TRAIL, implicating a selective effect of ST6Gal-I on the Fas receptor. Using ST6Gal-I knockdown and forced overexpression colon carcinoma cell models, we find that α2-6 sialylation of Fas prevents apoptosis stimulated by FasL as well as the Fas-activating antibody, CH11, as evidenced by decreased activation of caspases 8 and 3. We also show that α2-6 sialylation of Fas does not alter the binding of CH11, but rather inhibits the capacity of Fas to induce apoptosis by blocking the association of FADD with Fas cytoplasmic tails, an event that initiates death-inducing signaling complex formation. Furthermore, α2-6 sialylation of Fas inhibits Fas internalization, which is required for apoptotic signaling. Although dysregulated Fas activity is a well known mechanism through which tumors evade apoptosis, the current study is the first to link Fas insensitivity to the actions of a specific sialyltransferase. This finding establishes a new paradigm by which death receptor function is impaired for the self-protection of tumors against apoptosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global view of human protein glycosylation pathways and functions
Schjoldager, K. T., Narimatsu, Y., Joshi, H. J., & Clausen, H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00294-x · Cited by 1,309
Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer
Munkley, J., & Elliott, D. J. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.8155 · Cited by 521
Sialic acids sweeten a tumor's life
Büll, C., Stoel, M. A., den Brok, M. H., & Adema, G. J. (2014) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-0728 · Cited by 496
Insights into the role of sialylation in cancer progression and metastasis
Dobie, C., & Skropeta, D. (2021) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01126-7 · Cited by 348
Protein Glycosylation and Tumor Microenvironment Alterations Driving Cancer Hallmarks
Peixoto, A., Relvas-Santos, M., Azevedo, R., Santos, L. L., & Ferreira, J. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00380 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Swindall, A. F., & Bellis, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 22982-22990
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081695451
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sialylation of the Fas Death Receptor by ST6Gal-I Provides Protection against Fas-mediated Apoptosis in Colon Carcinoma Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m110.211375
- The paper
- Swindall, A. F., & Bellis, S. L. (2011). Sialylation of the Fas Death Receptor by ST6Gal-I Provides Protection against Fas-mediated Apoptosis in Colon Carcinoma Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m110.211375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.