A1Ao-ATP Synthase of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium Couples Sodium Ions for ATP Synthesis under Physiological Conditions
Open accessAbstract
An unresolved question in the bioenergetics of methanogenic archaea is how the generation of proton-motive and sodium-motive forces during methane production is used to synthesize ATP by the membrane-bound A(1)A(o)-ATP synthase, with both proton- and sodium-coupled enzymes being reported in methanogens. To address this question, we investigated the biochemical characteristics of the A(1)A(o)-ATP synthase (MbbrA(1)A(o)) of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1, a predominant methanogen in the rumen. Growth of M. ruminantium M1 was inhibited by protonophores and sodium ionophores, demonstrating that both ion gradients were essential for growth. To study the role of these ions in ATP synthesis, the ahaHIKECFABD operon encoding the MbbrA(1)A(o) was expressed in Escherichia coli strain DK8 (Δatp) and purified yielding a 9-subunit protein with an SDS-stable c oligomer. Analysis of the c subunit amino acid sequence revealed that it consisted of four transmembrane helices, and each hairpin displayed a complete Na(+)-binding signature made up of identical amino acid residues. The purified MbbrA(1)A(o) was stimulated by sodium ions, and Na(+) provided pH-dependent protection against inhibition by dicyclohexylcarbodiimide but not tributyltin chloride. ATP synthesis in inverted membrane vesicles lacking sodium ions was driven by a membrane potential that was sensitive to cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone but not to monensin. ATP synthesis could not be driven by a chemical gradient of sodium ions unless a membrane potential was imposed. ATP synthesis under these conditions was sensitive to monensin but not cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone. These data suggest that the M. ruminantium M1 A(1)A(o)-ATP synthase exhibits all the properties of a sodium-coupled enzyme, but it is also able to use protons to drive ATP synthesis under conditions that favor proton coupling, such as low pH and low levels of sodium ions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fact that the proton-motive force is more universal today than the sodium-motive force probably derives from evolutionary interpolation of quinones on earlier, necessarily promiscuous origins.
“The fact that the proton-motive force is more universal today than the sodium-motive force probably derives from evolutionary interpolation of quinones—which are always coupled to proton-dependent redox reactions—on these earlier, necessarily promiscuous origins [205].”
From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [205]
Any improvement in coupling requires that the ancient ATPase could use Na+ ions, similar to how the modern one can.
“Any improvement in coupling, of course, requires that the ancient ATPase could use Na+ ions, similar to how the modern one can [204,205], perhaps because hydronium ions (H3O+) have an identical charge and similar ionic radius to Na+ (ionic radii for unhydrated H3O+ = 115 pm, and for Na+ = 117 pm).”
From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [205]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- McMillan, D. G. G., Ferguson, S. A., Dey, D., Schröder, K., Aung, H. L., Carbone, V., Attwood, G. T., Ronimus, R. S., Meier, T., Janssen, P. H., & Cook, G. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- AgResearch (NZ)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Cook, Gregory M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 39882-39892
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3220524
- OpenAlex
- W2067418947
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- AgResearch
- University of Otago
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- Methanobrevibacter ruminantium, methanogenic archaea, subunit c, proton motive force, sodium motive force, membrane potential, protonophores, sodium ionophore, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, monensin, rumen methanogens, bioenergetics
- MeSH terms
- Adenosine Triphosphate, Cations, Monovalent, Proton-Translocating ATPases, Monensin, Operon, Sodium, Protein Structure, Secondary, Methanobrevibacter, Proton Ionophores, Sodium Ionophores
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review