Cited by 122Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Tau isoform composition influences rate and extent of filament formation

Open access
Zhong, Qi, Congdon, Erin E., Nagaraja, Haikady N., Kuret, Jeff·2012·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The risk of developing tauopathic neurodegenerative disease depends in part on the levels and composition of six naturally occurring Tau isoforms in human brain. These proteins, which form filamentous aggregates in disease, vary only by the presence or absence of three inserts encoded by alternatively spliced exons 2, 3, and 10 of the Tau gene (MAPT). To determine the contribution of alternatively spliced segments to Tau aggregation propensity, the aggregation kinetics of six unmodified, recombinant human Tau isoforms were examined in vitro using electron microscopy assay methods. Aggregation propensity was then compared at the level of elementary rate constants for nucleation and extension phases. We found that all three alternatively spliced segments modulated Tau aggregation but through differing kinetic mechanisms that could synergize or compete depending on sequence context. Overall, segments encoded by exons 2 and 10 promoted aggregation, whereas the segment encoded by exon 3 depressed it with its efficacy dependent on the presence or absence of a fourth microtubule binding repeat. In general, aggregation propensity correlated with genetic risk reported for multiple tauopathies, implicating aggregation as one candidate mechanism rationalizing the correlation between Tau expression patterns and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m112.364067

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 122

Authors
Zhong, Q., Congdon, E. E., Nagaraja, H. N., & Kuret, J.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kuret, Jeff
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
287
Issue
24
Pages
20711-20719
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081431264
Cited by
122
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG014452, AG 14452)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
tau isoforms, tauopathy, tau aggregation, alternative splicing, exon 2, exon 3, exon 10, nucleation rate, microtubule-binding repeats, aggregation kinetics, neurodegenerative disease risk, MAPT
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, tau Proteins, Alternative Splicing, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Protein Isoforms, Tauopathies, Multiprotein Complexes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review