The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Resolution Methylome Analysis Reveals Widespread Functional Hypomethylation during Adult Human Erythropoiesis
Abstract
Differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells to red cells requires coordinated expression of numerous erythroid genes and is characterized by nuclear condensation and extrusion during terminal development. To understand the regulatory mechanisms governing these widespread phenotypic changes, we conducted a high resolution methylomic and transcriptomic analysis of six major stages of human erythroid differentiation. We observed widespread epigenetic differences between early and late stages of erythropoiesis with progressive loss of methylation being the dominant change during differentiation. Gene bodies, intergenic regions, and CpG shores were preferentially demethylated during erythropoiesis. Epigenetic changes at transcription factor binding sites correlated significantly with changes in gene expression and were enriched for binding motifs for SCL, MYB, GATA, and other factors not previously implicated in erythropoiesis. Demethylation at gene promoters was associated with increased expression of genes, whereas epigenetic changes at gene bodies correlated inversely with gene expression. Important gene networks encoding erythrocyte membrane proteins, surface receptors, and heme synthesis proteins were found to be regulated by DNA methylation. Furthermore, integrative analysis enabled us to identify novel, potential regulatory areas of the genome as evident by epigenetic changes in a predicted PU.1 binding site in intron 1 of the GATA1 gene. This intronic site was found to be conserved across species and was validated to be a novel PU.1 binding site by quantitative ChIP in erythroid cells. Altogether, our study provides a comprehensive analysis of methylomic and transcriptomic changes during erythroid differentiation and demonstrates that human terminal erythropoiesis is surprisingly associated with hypomethylation of the genome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“PU.1 expression was high in human CD34+ cells and diminished in differentiated CD36+ cells (47) (Fig. 1F).”
From Histone deacetylase 1 activates PU.1 gene transcription through regulating TAF9 deacetylation and transcription factor IID assembly (2017) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heinz, S., Benner, C., Spann, N., Bertolino, E., Lin, Y. C., Laslo, P., Cheng, J. X., Murre, C., Singh, H., & Glass, C. K. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 · Cited by 13,382
Irizarry, R. A., Ladd-Acosta, C., Wen, B., Wu, Z., Montano, C., Onyango, P., Cui, H., Gabo, K., Rongione, M., Webster, M., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.298 · Cited by 2,177
Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells
Ball, M. P., Li, J. B., Gao, Y., Lee, J., LeProust, E. M., Park, I., Xie, B., Daley, G. Q., & Church, G. M. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1533 · Cited by 1,122
DNA Methylation Signatures Identify Biologically Distinct Subtypes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Figueroa, M. E., Lugthart, S., Li, Y., Erpelinck-Verschueren, C., Deng, X., Christos, P. J., Schifano, E., Booth, J., van Putten, W., Skrabanek, L., et al. (2010) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.11.020 · Cited by 833
Self-citationComprehensive methylome map of lineage commitment from haematopoietic progenitors
Ji, H., Ehrlich, L. I. R., Seita, J., Murakami, P. N., Doi, A., Lindau, P., Lee, H.-J., Aryee, M. J., Irizarry, R. A., Kim, K., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09367 · Cited by 657
Comparative isoschizomer profiling of cytosine methylation: The HELP assay
Khulan, B., Thompson, R. F., Ye, K., Fazzari, M. J., Suzuki, M., Stasiek, E., Figueroa, M. E., Glass, J. L., Chen, Q., Montagna, C., et al. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5273806 · Cited by 396
Self-citationTrowbridge, J. J., Snow, J. W., Kim, J., & Orkin, S. H. (2009) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2009.08.016 · Cited by 373
Global DNA Demethylation During Mouse Erythropoiesis in Vivo
Shearstone, J. R., Pop, R., Bock, C., Boyle, P., Meissner, A., & Socolovsky, M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207306 · Cited by 161
Oda, M., Glass, J. L., Thompson, R. F., Mo, Y., Olivier, E. N., Figueroa, M. E., Selzer, R. R., Richmond, T., Zhang, X., Dannenberg, L. O., et al. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp260 · Cited by 157
Self-citationStopka, T., Amanatullah, D. F., Papetti, M., & Skoultchi, A. I. (2005) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600834 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Cited by
Jian, W., Yan, B., Huang, S., & Qiu, Y. (2017) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.201700022r · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Y., Mo, Y., Ebenezer, D., Bhattacharyya, S., Liu, H., Sundaravel, S., Giricz, O., Wontakal, S., Cartier, J., Caces, B., Artz, A., Nischal, S., Bhagat, T., Bathon, K., Maqbool, S., Gligich, O., Suzuki, M., Steidl, U., Godley, L., Skoultchi, A., Greally, J., Wickrema, A., & Verma, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 8805-8814
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 26
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor, 2770 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.