Cited by 88Lipid metabolism and disordersLipid metabolism and biosynthesisBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Angiopoietin-like Protein 4 Inhibition of Lipoprotein Lipase

Open access
Lafferty, Michael J., Bradford, Kira C., Erie, Dorothy A., Neher, Saskia B.·2013·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Background: Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) clears triglycerides from the blood, and angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) inhibits LPL activity. Results: Inhibited LPL is in a complex with ANGPTL4, and upon dissociation LPL regains activity. Conclusion: ANGPTL4 is a reversible, noncompetitive inhibitor of LPL, not an unfolding molecular chaperone as reported previously. Significance: Understanding the mechanism of LPL inhibition supports efforts to develop new therapies for hypertriglyceridemia. Elevated triglycerides are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is the rate-limiting enzyme for the hydrolysis of triglycerides from circulating lipoproteins. The N-terminal domain of angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) inhibits LPL activity. ANGPTL4 was previously described as an unfolding molecular chaperone of LPL that catalytically converts active LPL dimers into inactive monomers. Our studies show that ANGPTL4 is more accurately described as a reversible, noncompetitive inhibitor of LPL. We find that inhibited LPL is in a complex with ANGPTL4, and upon dissociation, LPL regains lipase activity. Furthermore, we have generated a variant of ANGPTL4 that is dependent on divalent cations for its ability to inhibit LPL. We show that LPL inactivation by this regulatable variant of ANGPTL4 is fully reversible after treatment with a chelator.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m113.497602

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 88

Authors
Lafferty, M. J., Bradford, K. C., Erie, D. A., & Neher, S. B.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Neher, Saskia B.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
288
Issue
40
Pages
28524-28534
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094177365
Cited by
88
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM079480)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
ANGPTL4, lipoprotein lipase, enzyme inhibition, non-competitive inhibition, reversible inhibition, triglyceride clearance, hypertriglyceridemia, divalent cations, molecular chaperones, protein complex dissociation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Chromatography, Affinity, Cross-Linking Reagents, Enzyme Activation, Hot Temperature, Heparin, Lipoprotein Lipase, Models, Biological, Sepharose, Time Factors, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Angiopoietins, Multiprotein Complexes, Biocatalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review