Sry HMG box protein 9-positive (Sox9+) epithelial cell adhesion molecule-negative (EpCAM-) biphenotypic cells derived from hepatocytes are involved in mouse liver regeneration
Open accessAbstract
It has been shown that mature hepatocytes compensate tissue damages not only by proliferation and/or hypertrophy but also by conversion into cholangiocyte-like cells. We found that Sry HMG box protein 9-positive (Sox9(+)) epithelial cell adhesion molecule-negative (EpCAM(-)) hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α-positive (HNF4α(+)) biphenotypic cells showing hepatocytic morphology appeared near EpCAM(+) ductular structures in the livers of mice fed 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC)-containing diet. When Mx1-Cre:ROSA mice, which were injected with poly(I:C) to label mature hepatocytes, were fed with the DDC diet, we found LacZ(+)Sox9(+) cells near ductular structures. Although Sox9(+)EpCAM(-) cells adjacent to expanding ducts likely further converted into ductular cells, the incidence was rare. To know the cellular characteristics of Sox9(+)EpCAM(-) cells, we isolated them as GFP(+)EpCAM(-) cells from DDC-injured livers of Sox9-EGFP mice. Sox9(+)EpCAM(-) cells proliferated and could differentiate to functional hepatocytes in vitro. In addition, Sox9(+)EpCAM(-) cells formed cysts with a small central lumen in collagen gels containing Matrigel® without expressing EpCAM. These results suggest that Sox9(+)EpCAM(-) cells maintaining biphenotypic status can establish cholangiocyte-type polarity. Interestingly, we found that some of the Sox9(+) cells surrounded luminal spaces in DDC-injured liver while they expressed HNF4α. Taken together, we consider that in addition to converting to cholangiocyte-like cells, Sox9(+)EpCAM(-) cells provide luminal space near expanded ductular structures to prevent deterioration of the injuries and potentially supply new hepatocytes to repair damaged tissues.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In periportal injury, LPLCs are mainly generated in the region 1-5 layers away from injured bile ducts.
“In periportal injury, LPLCs are mainly generated in the region 1-5 layers away from injured bile ducts.[7][8][9]12,13”
From Kupffer-cell-derived IL-6 is repurposed for hepatocyte dedifferentiation via activating progenitor genes from injury-specific enhancers (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
The Results report Sox9+EpCAM− biphenotypic cells appearing in DDC-injured mouse livers, and the paper describes them near ductular structures. It does not establish that LPLCs are mainly generated 1–5 cell layers from injured bile ducts; the Discussion also distinguishes these cells from LPCs. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMature hepatocytes were found reprogrammed into LPLCs to contribute to liver repair after periportal injury.
“Importantly, mature hepatocytes were found reprogrammed into LPLCs to contribute to liver repair after periportal injury.7,9,13”
From Kupffer-cell-derived IL-6 is repurposed for hepatocyte dedifferentiation via activating progenitor genes from injury-specific enhancers (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
The Discussion identifies Sox9+EpCAM− cells derived from mature hepatocytes and says they may contribute to repair in DDC-injured mouse livers. It distinguishes these cells from LPCs, however, and speculates rather than establishes that hepatocytes near portal triads convert to cholangiocyte-like cells. The claim overstates the evidence for repair after periportal injury. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHepatocyte-to-HepPD conversion is likely to take place through a bi-phenotypic 'intermediate' status characterized by the co-expression of hepatocyte markers and progenitor-associated markers.
“Hepatocyte-to-HepPD conversion is likely to take place through a bi-phenotypic “intermediate” status characterized by the co-expression of hepatocyte markers and progenitor-associated markers (Tanimizu et al., 2014; Yanger et al., 2013”
From In Vitro Expansion of Primary Human Hepatocytes with Efficient Liver Repopulation Capacity (2018) · cites this paper as Tanimizu et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 105
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [1]1. Duncan, A.W. ∙ Dorrell, C. ∙ Grompe, M. Stem cells and liver regeneration Gastroenterology. 2009; 137:466-481 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (452) PubMed Google Scholar
- [2]2. Tanaka, M. ∙ Itoh, T. ∙ Tanimizu, N. ... Liver stem/progenitor cells: their characteristics and regulatory mechanisms J. Biochem. 2011; 149:231-239 Crossref Scopus (117) PubMed Google Scholar
- [3]3. Cardinale, V. ∙ Wang, Y. ∙ Carpino, G. ... The biliary tree–a reservoir of multipotent stem cells Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012; 9:231-240 Crossref Scopus (174) PubMed Google Scholar
- [4]4. Okabe, M. ∙ Tsukahara, Y. ∙ Tanaka, M. ... Potential hepatic stem cells reside in EpCAM+ cells of normal and injured mouse liver Development. 2009; 136:1951-1960 Crossref Scopus (243) PubMed Google Scholar
- [5]5. Suzuki, A. ∙ Sekiya, S. ∙ Onishi, M. ... Flow cytometric isolation and clonal identification of self-renewing bipotent hepatic progenitor cells in adult mouse liver Hepatology. 2008; 48:1964-1978 Crossref Scopus (143) PubMed Google Scholar
- [6]6. Kamiya, A. ∙ Kakinuma, S. ∙ Yamazaki, Y. ... Enrichment and clonal culture of progenitor cells during mouse postnatal liver development in mice Gastroenterology. 2009; 137:1114-1126
- Authors
- Tanimizu, N., Nishikawa, Y., Ichinohe, N., Akiyama, H., & Mitaka, T.
- Affiliations
- Sapporo Medical University (JP)
- Asahikawa Medical University (JP)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Tanimizu, Naoki
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 7589-7598
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3953272
- OpenAlex
- W2082699771
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25293289, 24390092, 25282135, 24390304, 24659591, 26460474, 25670186)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
- Keywords
- liver regeneration, SOX9, HNF4α, ductular reaction, hepatocyte differentiation, DDC-induced liver injury
- MeSH terms
- Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule, Animals, Antigens, Neoplasm, Cell Differentiation, Immunohistochemistry, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Phenotype, Pyridines, Stem Cells, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Hepatocytes, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice, SOX9 Transcription Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review