Cited by 119

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Complex Pattern of Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase Shedding

Toth, Marta, Hernandez-Barrantes, Sonia, Osenkowski, Pamela, Bernardo, M. Margarida, Gervasi, David C., Shimura, Yoichiro, Meroueh, Oussama, Kotra, Lakshmi P., Gálvez, Beatriz G., Arroyo, Alicia G., Mobashery, Shahriar, Fridman, Rafael·2002·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) is a type I transmembrane MMP shown to play a critical role in normal development and in malignant processes. Emerging evidence indicates that MT1-MMP is regulated by a process of ectodomain shedding. Active MT1-MMP undergoes autocatalytic processing on the cell surface, leading to the formation of an inactive 44-kDa fragment and release of the entire catalytic domain. Analysis of the released MT1-MMP forms in various cell types revealed a complex pattern of shedding involving two major fragments of 50 and 18 kDa and two minor species of 56 and 31-35 kDa. Protease inhibitor studies and a catalytically inactive MT1-MMP mutant revealed both autocatalytic (18 kDa) and non-autocatalytic (56, 50, and 31-35 kDa) shedding mechanisms. Purification and sequencing of the 18-kDa fragment indicated that it extends from Tyr(112) to Ala(255). Structural and sequencing data indicate that shedding of the 18-kDa fragment is initiated at the Gly(284)-Gly(285) site, followed by cleavage between the conserved Ala(255) and Ile(256) residues near the conserved methionine turn, a structural feature of the catalytic domain of all MMPs. Consistently, a recombinant 18-kDa fragment had no catalytic activity and did not bind TIMP-2. Thus, autocatalytic shedding evolved as a specific mechanism to terminate MT1-MMP activity on the cell surface by disrupting enzyme integrity at a vital structural site. In contrast, functional data suggest that the non-auto…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m200655200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MT1-MMP is constitutively shed via proteolytic cleavage by ADAM family metalloproteinases, resulting in detectable quantities of soluble MT1-MMP (sMT1-MMP) in the plasma.

    “MT1-MMP is constitutively shed via proteolytic cleavage by A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase (ADAM) family metalloproteinases, resulting in detectable quantities of soluble MT1-MMP (sMT1-MMP) in the plasma20–22.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Kiessling, 1998, Chem. Biol., 5, R49, 10.1016/S1074-5521(98)90056-4 · DOI
  2. Seiki, 1999, APMIS, 107, 137, 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1999.tb01536.x · DOI
  3. Hernandez-Barrantes, 2002, Semin. Cancer Biol., 12, 131, 10.1006/scbi.2001.0421 · DOI
  4. d'Ortho, 1997, Eur. J. Biochem., 250, 751, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00751.x · DOI
  5. Ohuchi, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 2446, 10.1074/jbc.272.4.2446 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Belkin, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 18415, 10.1074/jbc.M010135200 · DOI
  7. Deryugina, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 9749, 10.1074/jbc.M110269200 · DOI
  8. Kajita, 2001, J. Cell Biol., 153, 893, 10.1083/jcb.153.5.893 · DOI
  9. Strongin, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 5331, 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5331 · DOI
  10. Sato, 1994, Nature, 370, 61, 10.1038/370061a0 · DOI
  11. Holmbeck, 1999, Cell, 99, 81, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80064-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hotary, 2000, J. Cell Biol., 149, 1309, 10.1083/jcb.149.6.1309 · DOI
  13. Sato, 1997, Thromb. Haemostasis, 78, 497, 10.1055/s-0038-1657576 · DOI
  14. Tsunezuka, 1996, Cancer Res., 56, 5678
  15. Lehti, 1998, Biochem. J., 334, 345, 10.1042/bj3340345 · DOI
  16. Stanton, 1998, J. Cell Sci., 111, 2789, 10.1242/jcs.111.18.2789 · DOI
  17. Hernandez-Barrantes, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 12080, 10.1074/jbc.275.16.12080 · DOI
  18. Wang, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 35953, 10.1074/jbc.M103680200 · DOI
  19. Hernandez-Barrantes, 2001, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 281, 126, 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4323 · DOI
  20. Toth, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 41415, 10.1074/jbc.M006871200 · DOI
  21. Bernardo, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 11201, 10.1074/jbc.M111021200 · DOI
  22. Lehti, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 15006, 10.1074/jbc.M910220199 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Harayama, 1999, Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 90, 942, 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00839.x · DOI
  24. Imai, 1996, Cancer Res., 56, 2707
  25. Li, 1998, Mol. Carcinog., 22, 84, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2744(199806)22:2<84::AID-MC3>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  26. Pei, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 8925, 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8925 · DOI
  27. Matsumoto, 1997, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1354, 159, 10.1016/S0167-4781(97)00120-6 · DOI
  28. Fridman, 1993, Biochem. J., 289, 411, 10.1042/bj2890411 · DOI
  29. Gervasi, 1996, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 228, 530, 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1694 · DOI
  30. Toth, 1999, J. Cell. Physiol., 180, 131, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199907)180:1<131::AID-JCP15>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  31. Wang, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 26411, 10.1074/jbc.M001270200 · DOI
  32. Fuerst, 1987, Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 2538, 10.1128/MCB.7.7.2538 · DOI
  33. Fridman, 1992, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 15398, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)49547-1 · DOI
  34. Olson, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 29975, 10.1074/jbc.272.47.29975 · DOI
  35. Brown, 1997, Med. Oncol., 14, 1, 10.1007/BF02990939 · DOI
  36. Brown, 2000, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 6799, 10.1021/ja001461n · DOI
  37. Olson, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 10672, 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10672 · DOI
  38. Toth, 1997, Cancer Res., 57, 3159
  39. Galvez, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 37491, 10.1074/jbc.M104094200 · DOI
  40. Laemmli, 1970, Nature, 227, 680, 10.1038/227680a0 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Becker, 1995, Protein Sci., 4, 1966, 10.1002/pro.5560041002 · DOI
  42. Massova, 1998, FASEB J., 12, 1075, 10.1096/fasebj.12.12.1075 · DOI
  43. Fernandez-Catalan, 1998, EMBO J., 17, 5238, 10.1093/emboj/17.17.5238 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Cornell, 1995, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 5179, 10.1021/ja00124a002 · DOI
  45. Massova, 1997, J. Mol. Model., 3, 17, 10.1007/s008940050021 · DOI
  46. Jorgensen, 1983, J. Chem. Phys., 79, 926, 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  47. Knight, 1995, Methods Enzymol., 248, 18, 10.1016/0076-6879(95)48004-8 · DOI
  48. Murphy, 1995, Methods Enzymol., 248, 496, 10.1016/0076-6879(95)48032-3 · DOI
  49. Yu, 1995, Cancer Res., 55, 3272
  50. Dolo, 1998, Cancer Res., 58, 4468
  51. Taraboletti, 2002, Am. J. Pathol., 160, 673, 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64887-0 · DOI
  52. Will, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 17119, 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17119 · DOI
  53. Morgunova, 1999, Science, 284, 1667, 10.1126/science.284.5420.1667 · DOI
  54. Bode, 1993, FEBS Lett., 331, 134, 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80312-I · DOI
  55. Butler, 1997, Eur. J. Biochem., 244, 653, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00653.x · DOI
  56. Maquoi, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 11368, 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11368 · DOI
  57. Jiang, 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 13693, 10.1073/pnas.241293698 · DOI
  58. Foda, 1996, Lab. Invest., 74, 538
  59. Rozanov, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 25705, 10.1074/jbc.M007921200 · DOI
  60. Lehti, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 8440, 10.1074/jbc.M109128200 · DOI
  61. Bigg, 2001, Cancer Res., 61, 3610

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Toth, M., Hernandez-Barrantes, S., Osenkowski, P., Bernardo, M. M., Gervasi, D. C., Shimura, Y., Meroueh, O., Kotra, L. P., Gálvez, B. G., Arroyo, A. G., Mobashery, S., & Fridman, R.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
277
Issue
29
Pages
26340-26350
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
119
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review