Cited by 21Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

In Vitro Assembly of Alzheimer-like Filaments

Open access
DeTure, Michael A., Di Noto, Luca, Purich, Daniel L.·2002·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Although the microtubule-binding regions (MTBRs) of both Tau and MAP2 can undergo self-assembly into straight filaments (SFs) in vitro, only the Tau MTBR forms paired helical filaments (PHFs). Moreover, Tau appears to be the exclusive building block of the neuropathic filaments observed in Alzheimer's disease and certain frontotemporal dementias (FTDs). Despite significant conservation in the MTBR sequences, there are two persistently different stretches of amino acids (designated here as Module-A and Module-B) between Tau and MAP2 from a number of organisms. To evaluate the role of charged residues in these modules as potential morphology-specifying elements, we used site-directed mutagenesis to replace selected residues within the MAP2 MTBR by residues at corresponding positions in Tau. We then employed electron microscopy to determine the frequency of occurrence of SF and PHF morphology in filaments assembled from these mutant microtubule-binding regions. Our experimental results indicate that a very small number of residues are especially significant determinants of filament morphology; this inference is also supported by the observation that site-directed substitutions of individual Tau residues into MAP2 Module-B likewise result in the formation of PHF-like structures. Because the Module-B in Tau contains two naturally occurring FTD mutations, residues in this region may play a critical role in neuropathic filament assembly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m201201200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro experiments have demonstrated that MAP2 forms either fibrillar or granular, non-amyloidogenic aggregates.

    “In vitro experiments have demonstrated that MAP2 forms either fibrillar (30, 31) or granular, non-amyloidogenic aggregates (32, 33).”

    From MAP2 caps tau fibrils and inhibits aggregation (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 21

Authors
DeTure, M. A., Di Noto, L., & Purich, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Purich, Daniel L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
277
Issue
38
Pages
34755-34759
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975128996
Cited by
21
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, tau protein, MAP2, microtubule-binding region, paired helical filaments, straight filaments, filament morphology, charged residues, site-directed mutagenesis
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutagenesis, tau Proteins, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review