Cited by 388DNA Repair MechanismsCancer-related Molecular PathwaysCancer therapeutics and mechanisms

Chk1 mediates S and G2 arrests through Cdc25A degradation in response to DNA-damaging agents

Open access
Xiao, Zhan, Chen, Zehan, Gunasekera, Angelo H., Sowin, Thomas J., Rosenberg, Saul H., Fesik, Steve, Zhang, Haiying·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

UV and ionizing radiation (IR) activate DNA damage checkpoints and induce Cdc25A degradation (Mailand, N., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Syljuasen, R. G., Welcker, M., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2000) Science 288, 1425-1429; Falck, J., Mailand, N., Syljuasen, R. G., Bartek, J., and Lukas J. (2001) Nature 410, 842-847). The degradation of Cdc25A is abrogated by caffeine, which implicates Chk1 as the potential mediator (Mailand, N., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Syljuasen, R. G., Welcker, M., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2000) Science 288, 1425-1429). However, the involvement of Chk1 is far from clear, because caffeine is a rather nonspecific inhibitor of the ATR/Chk1 signaling pathway. Additionally, it is not known whether DNA-damaging drugs commonly used in chemotherapy, which may activate different signal transduction pathways than UV or IR, also confer Cdc25A degradation. Herein, we show that camptothecin and doxorubicin, two widely used topoisomerase inhibitors conferring S and G2 arrest, respectively, cause the degradation of Cdc25A. Using a small interfering RNA that enables the specific elimination of Chk1 expression, we show that the observed proteolysis of Cdc25A is mediated through Chk1. Moreover, Cdc25A overexpression abrogates the Chk1-mediated degradation and overcomes the doxorubicin-induced G2 arrest through dephosphorylation and activation of Cdc2/Cdk1 in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that: (a) Cdc25A is involved in the G2/M transition in addition to its commonly accepted effect on G1/S progression, and (b) Chk1 mediates both S and G2 checkpoint and is thus a more ubiquitous cell cycle checkpoint mediator than previously thought.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m300229200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 388

Authors
Xiao, Z., Chen, Z., Gunasekera, A. H., Sowin, T. J., Rosenberg, S. H., Fesik, S., & Zhang, H.
Affiliations
Abbott (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Xiao, Zhan
  • Zhang, Haiying
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
278
Issue
24
Pages
21767-21773
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145339037
Cited by
388
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 30
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Keywords
Chk1, CDC25A, DNA damage checkpoint, S phase arrest, G2/M cell cycle arrest, camptothecin, doxorubicin, topoisomerase inhibitors, G2/M transition
MeSH terms
Checkpoint Kinase 1, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Camptothecin, Cell Cycle, Cell Separation, DNA Damage, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Doxorubicin, Enzyme Inhibitors, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinases, Time Factors, Transfection, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Tyrosine, Ultraviolet Rays, Blotting, Western, G2 Phase, S Phase, cdc25 Phosphatases, RNA, Small Interfering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review