The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Modular Substrates Demonstrates Mechanistic Diversity and Reveals Differences in Chaperone Requirement of ERAD
Open accessAbstract
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) harbors a protein quality control system, which monitors protein folding in the ER. Elimination of malfolded proteins is an important function of this protein quality control. Earlier studies with various soluble and transmembrane ER-associated degradation (ERAD) substrates revealed differences in the ER degradation machinery used. To unravel the nature of these differences we generated two type I membrane ERAD substrates carrying malfolded carboxypeptidase yscY (CPY*) as the ER-luminal ERAD recognition motif. Whereas the first, CT* (CPY*-TM), has no cytoplasmic domain, the second, CTG*, has the green fluorescent protein present in the cytosol. Together with CPY*, these three substrates represent topologically diverse malfolded proteins, degraded via ERAD. Our data show that degradation of all three proteins is dependent on the ubiquitin-proteasome system involving the ubiquitin-protein ligase complex Der3/Hrd1p-Hrd3p, the ubiquitin conjugating enzymes Ubc1p and Ubc7p, as well as the AAA-ATPase complex Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 and the 26S proteasome. In contrast to soluble CPY*, degradation of the membrane proteins CT* and CTG* does not require the ER proteins Kar2p (BiP) and Der1p. Instead, CTG* degradation requires cytosolic Hsp70, Hsp40, and Hsp104p chaperones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97 and its partners transport proteins from the ER into the cytosol
Ye, Y., Meyer, H. H., & Rapoport, T. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414652a · Cited by 1,099
A regulatory link between ER-associated protein degradation and the unfolded-protein response
Friedlander, R., Jarosch, E., Urban, J., Volkwein, C., & Sommer, T. (2000) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35017001 · Cited by 474
Mutational Analysis of Hsp90 Function: Interactions with a Steroid Receptor and a Protein Kinase
Nathan, D. F., & Lindquist, S. (1995) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.15.7.3917 · Cited by 423
Jakob, C. A., Burda, P., Roth, J., & Aebi, M. (1998) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.142.5.1223 · Cited by 338
Cited by
A membrane protein required for dislocation of misfolded proteins from the ER
Lilley, B. N., & Ploegh, H. L. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02592 · Cited by 674
ER-associated degradation: Protein quality control and beyond
Ruggiano, A., Foresti, O., & Carvalho, P. (2014) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201312042 · Cited by 607
The J‐protein family: modulating protein assembly, disassembly and translocation
Walsh, P., Bursać, D., Law, Y. C., Cyr, D., & Lithgow, T. (2004) · EMBO reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400172 · Cited by 484
A Luminal Surveillance Complex that Selects Misfolded Glycoproteins for ER-Associated Degradation
Denic, V., Quan, E. M., & Weissman, J. S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.045 · Cited by 422
Glycosylation-directed quality control of protein folding
Xu, C., & Ng, D. T. W. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4073 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Taxis, C., Hitt, R., Park, S.-H., Deak, P. M., Kostova, Z., & Wolf, D. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 35903-35913
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049656093
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Modular Substrates Demonstrates Mechanistic Diversity and Reveals Differences in Chaperone Requirement of ERAD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m301080200
- The paper
- Taxis, C., Hitt, R., Park, S.-H., Deak, P. M., Kostova, Z., & Wolf, D. H. (2003). Use of Modular Substrates Demonstrates Mechanistic Diversity and Reveals Differences in Chaperone Requirement of ERAD. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m301080200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.