Cited by 345Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Valproate Induces Replication-independent Active DNA Demethylation

Open access
Detich, Nancy, Bovenzi, Veronica, Szyf, Moshe·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

In this report, we demonstrate that valproic acid (VPA), a drug that has been used for decades in the treatment of epilepsy and as a mood stabilizer, triggers replication-independent active demethylation of DNA. Thus, this drug can potentially reverse DNA methylation patterns and erase stable methylation imprints on DNA in non-dividing cells. Recent discoveries support a role for VPA in the regulation of methylated genes; however, the mechanism has been unclear because it is difficult to dissociate active demethylation from the absence of DNA methylation during DNA synthesis. We therefore took advantage of an assay that measures active DNA demethylation independently from other DNA methylation and DNA replication activities in human embryonal kidney 293 cells. We show that VPA induces histone acetylation, DNA demethylation, and expression of an ectopically methylated CMV-GFP plasmid in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, valpromide, an analogue of VPA that does not induce histone acetylation, does not induce demethylation or expression of CMV-GFP. Furthermore, we illustrate that methylated DNA-binding protein 2/DNA demethylase (MBD2/dMTase) participates in this reaction since antisense knockdown of MBD2/dMTase attenuates VPA-induced demethylation. Taken together, our data support a new mechanism of action for VPA as enhancing intracellular demethylase activity through its effects on histone acetylation and raises the possibility that DNA methylation is reversible independent of DNA replication by commonly prescribed drugs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m303740200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Valproic acid is known as a reactivator of silenced genes and appeared to be a weak reactivator of full mutation.

    “The third tested compound is valproic acid (101), which is already known as a reactivator of silenced genes (102) that appeared to be a weak reactivator of FM (103).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 345

Authors
Detich, N., Bovenzi, V., & Szyf, M.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
278
Issue
30
Pages
27586-27592
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010629311
Cited by
345
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 26
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
valproic acid, active DNA demethylation, histone acetylation, DNA demethylase, valpromide, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Cell Line, DNA, DNA Replication, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enzyme Inhibitors, Histones, Humans, Luminescent Proteins, Plasmids, Precipitin Tests, Protein Binding, Sulfites, Transfection, Valproic Acid, Blotting, Southern, Blotting, Western, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Physical Chromosome Mapping, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review