Valproate Induces Replication-independent Active DNA Demethylation
Open accessAbstract
In this report, we demonstrate that valproic acid (VPA), a drug that has been used for decades in the treatment of epilepsy and as a mood stabilizer, triggers replication-independent active demethylation of DNA. Thus, this drug can potentially reverse DNA methylation patterns and erase stable methylation imprints on DNA in non-dividing cells. Recent discoveries support a role for VPA in the regulation of methylated genes; however, the mechanism has been unclear because it is difficult to dissociate active demethylation from the absence of DNA methylation during DNA synthesis. We therefore took advantage of an assay that measures active DNA demethylation independently from other DNA methylation and DNA replication activities in human embryonal kidney 293 cells. We show that VPA induces histone acetylation, DNA demethylation, and expression of an ectopically methylated CMV-GFP plasmid in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, valpromide, an analogue of VPA that does not induce histone acetylation, does not induce demethylation or expression of CMV-GFP. Furthermore, we illustrate that methylated DNA-binding protein 2/DNA demethylase (MBD2/dMTase) participates in this reaction since antisense knockdown of MBD2/dMTase attenuates VPA-induced demethylation. Taken together, our data support a new mechanism of action for VPA as enhancing intracellular demethylase activity through its effects on histone acetylation and raises the possibility that DNA methylation is reversible independent of DNA replication by commonly prescribed drugs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Valproic acid is known as a reactivator of silenced genes and appeared to be a weak reactivator of full mutation.
“The third tested compound is valproic acid (101), which is already known as a reactivator of silenced genes (102) that appeared to be a weak reactivator of FM (103).”
From Fragile X syndrome: causes, diagnosis, mechanisms, and therapeutics (2012) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 345
- Authors
- Detich, N., Bovenzi, V., & Szyf, M.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 27586-27592
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010629311
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Keywords
- valproic acid, active DNA demethylation, histone acetylation, DNA demethylase, valpromide, mechanism of action
- MeSH terms
- Cell Line, DNA, DNA Replication, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enzyme Inhibitors, Histones, Humans, Luminescent Proteins, Plasmids, Precipitin Tests, Protein Binding, Sulfites, Transfection, Valproic Acid, Blotting, Southern, Blotting, Western, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Physical Chromosome Mapping, Green Fluorescent Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review