Cited by 108Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

A Docking Site in MKK4 Mediates High Affinity Binding to JNK MAPKs and Competes with Similar Docking Sites in JNK Substrates

Open access
Ho, David T., Bardwell, A.Jane, Abdollahi, Mahsa, Bardwell, Lee·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Specific docking interactions between MAPKs and their activating MAPK kinases (MKKs or MEKs) are crucial for efficient and accurate signal transmission. Here, we report the identification of a MAPK-docking site, or "D-site," in the N terminus of human MKK4/JNKK1. This docking site conforms to the consensus sequence for known D-sites in other MKKs and contains the first of the two cleavage sites for anthrax lethal factor protease that have been found in the N terminus of MKK4. This docking site was both necessary and sufficient for the high affinity binding of the MAPKs JNK1, JNK2, JNK3, p38 alpha, and p38 beta to MKK4. Mutations that altered conserved residues in this docking site reduced JNK/p38 binding. In addition, a peptide version of this docking site, as well as a peptide version of the JNK-binding site of the JIP-1 scaffold protein, inhibited both MKK4/JNK binding and MKK4-mediated phosphorylation of JNK1. These same peptides also inhibited JNK2-mediated phosphorylation of c-Jun and ATF2, suggesting that transcription factors, MKK4, and the JIP scaffold compete for docking to JNK. Finally, the selectivity of the MKK4, MEK1, and MEK2 D-sites for JNK versus ERK was quantified. The MEK1 and MEK2 D-sites displayed a strong selectivity for their cognate MAPK (ERK2) versus a non-cognate MAPK (JNK). In contrast, the MKK4 D-site exhibited only limited selectivity for JNK versus ERK.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m304229200

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The structural and biochemical analysis, together with other studies, clarified the minimal sequence requirements for linear motifs to bind the MAPK docking groove.

    “Our structural and biochemical analysis in combination with other studies clarified the minimal sequence requirements for linear motifs to bind the MAPK docking groove (42-47).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 108

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Xia, X. G., Harding, T., Weller, M., Bieneman, A., Uney, J. B., and Schulz, J. B. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 10433-10438

Authors
Ho, D. T., Bardwell, A. J., Abdollahi, M., & Bardwell, L.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Bardwell, Lee
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
278
Issue
35
Pages
32662-32672
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011659866
Cited by
108
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, Irvine
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-60366, R01GM060366)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM-07443, T15LM007443)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
MKK4, JNK MAPK, JNK1 phosphorylation, c-Jun phosphorylation, ATF2 phosphorylation, MAPK signaling
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Codon, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Glutathione Transferase, Humans, Kinetics, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptides, Phosphorylation, Plasmids, Protein Binding, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Conserved Sequence, Protein Structure, Tertiary, DNA Primers, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1, Amino Acid Motifs, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, MAP Kinase Signaling System, p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 8, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 9, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 10, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 11, MAP Kinase Kinase 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review