Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mint-3 regulates the retrieval of the internalized membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase, MT5-MMP, to the plasma membrane by binding to its carboxyl end motif EWV.

Wang, Ping, Wang, Xing, Pei, Duanqing·2004·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Membrane type matrix metalloproteinases (MT-MMPs) play a critical role in promoting cell growth and migration within the extracellular matrix by trafficking to specialized areas. Here we show that the carboxyl EWV motif of MT5-MMP serves as a retrieval signal for internalized MT5-MMP by interacting with Mint-3, a protein with two type III PDZ domains. Deletion of the EWV signal impairs the recycling of MT5-MMP without affecting its internalization, leading to decreased activity on the cell surface. A yeast two-hybrid screening identified Mint-3 as the EWV-binding protein. Mint-3 stimulates MT5-MMP activity when expressed at low levels in an EWV-dependent fashion, but inhibits its activity at higher levels independent of the EWV motif. siRNA-mediated knockdown of endogenous Mint-3 decreased MT5-MMP activity. Furthermore, Mint-3 significantly increased the level of MT5-MMP on the cell surface without affecting its synthesis and internalization. Therefore, Mints may be the adaptor proteins that regulate the trafficking of MT-MMPs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m400264200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Yamada, 2003, Nature, 424, 889, 10.1038/424889a · DOI
  2. Hotary, 2003, Cell, 114, 33, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00513-0 · DOI
  3. Sato, 1994, Nature, 370, 61, 10.1038/370061a0 · DOI
  4. Birkedal-Hansen, 1993, Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med., 4, 197, 10.1177/10454411930040020401 · DOI
  5. Lopez-Otin, 2002, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 3, 509, 10.1038/nrm858 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Pei, 1999, Cell Res., 9, 291, 10.1038/sj.cr.7290028 · DOI
  7. Kang, 2000, FASEB J., 14, 2559, 10.1096/fj.00-0269com · DOI
  8. Jiang, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 38765, 10.1074/jbc.M306618200 · DOI
  9. Jiang, 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 13693, 10.1073/pnas.241293698 · DOI
  10. Uekita, 2001, J. Cell Biol., 155, 1345, 10.1083/jcb.200108112 · DOI
  11. Remacle, 2003, J. Cell Sci., 116, 3905, 10.1242/jcs.00710 · DOI
  12. Wang, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 9331, 10.1074/jbc.M312369200 · DOI
  13. Rozanov, 2002, FEBS Lett., 527, 51, 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03153-8 · DOI
  14. Llano, 1999, Cancer Res., 59, 2570
  15. Hayashita-Kinoh, 2001, Cell Growth Differ., 12, 573
  16. Pei, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 8925, 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8925 · DOI
  17. Kang, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 21960, 10.1074/jbc.M007997200 · DOI
  18. Yang, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 30219, 10.1074/jbc.M111933200 · DOI
  19. Okamoto, 1998, Eur. J. Cell Biol., 77, 161, 10.1016/S0171-9335(98)80103-9 · DOI
  20. Okamoto, 2001, Neuroscience, 104, 653, 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00124-5 · DOI
  21. Okamoto, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 31459, 10.1074/jbc.272.50.31459 · DOI
  22. Ho, 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100, 1409, 10.1073/pnas.252774899 · DOI
  23. Holmbeck, 1999, Cell, 99, 81, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80064-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Zhou, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 4052, 10.1073/pnas.060037197 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Nourry, 2003, Sci. STKE, 2003, RE7, 10.1126/stke.2003.179.re7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, P., Wang, X., & Pei, D.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
279
Issue
19
Pages
20461-20470
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
57
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review