Cited by 85DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Interaction of Checkpoint Proteins Hus1/Rad1/Rad9 with DNA Base Excision Repair Enzyme MutY Homolog in Fission Yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Open access
Chang, Dau-Yin, Lu, A-Lien·2005·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The DNA glycosylase MutY homolog (MYH) is responsible for removing adenines misincorporated opposite DNA strands containing guanine or 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine by base excision repair thereby preventing G:C to T:A mutations. MYH has been shown to interact with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in both human and fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe systems. Here we show that S. pombe (Sp) MYH physically interacts with all subunits of the PCNA-like checkpoint protein heterotrimer, SpRad9/SpRad1/SpHus1, in yeast extracts and when the individual subunits are expressed in bacteria. The SpHus1 and SpPCNA binding sites are located in discrete regions of SpMYH. Immunoprecipitation assays reveal that the interaction between SpHus1 and SpMYH increases dramatically after hydrogen peroxide treatment, and this increase in the SpHus1-SpMYH interaction correlates with the presence of SpHus1 phosphorylation. In contrast, the interaction between SpPCNA and SpMYH after hydrogen peroxide treatment remains nearly unchanged. SpMYH associates with SpHus1 in a complex of approximately 450 kDa, the reported native molecular mass of the SpRad9/SpRad1/SpHus1-MYC complex. A larger portion of SpMYH shifts to the 150-500-kDa regions after hydrogen peroxide treatment in comparison with untreated extracts. SpHus1 phosphorylation is substantially reduced in SpMYH Delta cells after hydrogen peroxide treatment. These data suggest that MYH may act as an adaptor to recruit checkpoint proteins to the DNA lesions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m406800200

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 9-1-1 complex interacts with BER proteins APE1, Pol β, FEN1, DNA ligase I, and DNA glycosylases MutY, NEIL1, and TDG, stimulating their DNA repair activities.

    “As a critical component of ATR-Chk1 checkpoint pathway, the 9-1-1 complex interacts with several BER proteins: APE1, Polymerase β (Pol β), FEN1, DNA ligase I, as well as DNA glycosylases MutY, NEIL1, and TDG, thereby stimulating their DNA repair activities [177–185] (Fig. 3).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 85

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Wang, Y., and Qin, J. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 15387-15392
  2. Radicella, J. P., Dherin, C., Desmaze, C., Fox, M. S., and Boiteux, S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8010 -8015
  3. Roldan-Arjona, T., Wei, Y.-F., Carter, K. C., Klungland, A., Anselmino, C., Wang, R.-P., Augustus, M., and Lindahl, T. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  4. Bermudez, V. P., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Cesare, A. J., Maniwa, Y., Griffith, J. D., Hurwitz, J., and Sancar, A. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 1633-1638
  5. Duckett, D. R., Bronstein, S. M., Taya, Y., and Modrich, P. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 12384 -12388
  6. Hickman, M. J., and Samson, L. D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 10764 -10769

Authors
Chang, D.-Y., & Lu, A.-L.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Lu, A-Lien
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
280
Issue
1
Pages
408-417
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002820477
Cited by
85
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Cancer Institute (CA/ES78391)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM035132, GM 35132)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
MUTYH, base excision repair, DNA glycosylase, DNA damage checkpoint, Hus1, RAD1, Rad9, PCNA, protein-protein interaction, hydrogen peroxide, protein phosphorylation, 8-oxoguanine, Schizosaccharomyces pombe
MeSH terms
DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endonucleases, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Schizosaccharomyces, Cell Cycle Proteins, Protein Subunits, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, DNA Glycosylases, Macromolecular Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review