The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining the SUMO-modified Proteome by Multiple Approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae*
Open accessAbstract
SUMO, or Smt3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a ubiquitin-like protein that is post-translationally attached to multiple proteins in vivo. Many of these substrate modifications are cell cycle-regulated, and SUMO conjugation is essential for viability in most eukaryotes. However, only a limited number of SUMO-modified proteins have been definitively identified to date, and this has hampered study of the mechanisms by which SUMO ligation regulates specific cellular pathways. Here we use a combination of yeast two-hybrid screening, a high copy suppressor selection with a SUMO isopeptidase mutant, and tandem mass spectrometry to define a large set of proteins (>150) that can be modified by SUMO in budding yeast. These three approaches yielded overlapping sets of proteins with the most extensive set by far being those identified by mass spectrometry. The two-hybrid data also yielded a potential SUMO-binding motif. Functional categories of SUMO-modified proteins include SUMO conjugation system enzymes, chromatin- and gene silencing-related factors, DNA repair and genome stability proteins, stress-related proteins, transcription factors, proteins involved in translation and RNA metabolism, and a variety of metabolic enzymes. The results point to a surprisingly broad array of cellular processes regulated by SUMO conjugation and provide a starting point for detailed studies of how SUMO ligation contributes to these different regulatory mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global analysis of protein expression in yeast
Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.-K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Shea, E. K., & Weissman, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02046 · Cited by 3,750
Cited by
GPS-SUMO: a tool for the prediction of sumoylation sites and SUMO-interaction motifs
Zhao, Q., Xie, Y., Zheng, Y., Jiang, S., Liu, W., Mu, W., Liu, Z., Zhao, Y., Xue, Y., & Ren, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku383 · Cited by 522
Saracco, S. A., Miller, M. J., Kurepa, J., & Vierstra, R. D. (2007) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.107.102285 · Cited by 287
Systematic study of protein sumoylation: Development of a site‐specific predictor of SUMOsp 2.0
Ren, J., Gao, X., Jin, C., Zhu, M., Wang, X., Shaw, A., Wen, L., Yao, X., & Xue, Y. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800646 · Cited by 262
Weighing in on ubiquitin: the expanding role of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics
Kirkpatrick, D. S., Denison, C., & Gygi, S. P. (2005) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb0805-750 · Cited by 209
Beads-on-a-String, Characterization of Ets-1 Sumoylated within Its Flexible N-terminal Sequence
Macauley, M. S., Errington, W. J., Schärpf, M., Mackereth, C. D., Blaszczak, A. G., Graves, B. J., & McIntosh, L. P. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m510488200 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Hannich, J. T., Lewis, A., Kroetz, M. B., Li, S.-J., Heide, H., Emili, A., & Hochstrasser, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4102-4110
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091602394
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining the SUMO-modified Proteome by Multiple Approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m413209200
- The paper
- Hannich, J. T., Lewis, A., Kroetz, M. B., Li, S.-J., Heide, H., Emili, A., & Hochstrasser, M. (2005). Defining the SUMO-modified Proteome by Multiple Approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae*. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m413209200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.