Cited by 584Bone Metabolism and DiseasesWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerBone health and osteoporosis research

Essential role of β-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition.

Open access
Holmen, Sheri L., Zylstra, Cassandra R., Mukherjee, Aditi, Sigler, Robert E., Faugere, Marie-Claude, Bouxsein, Mary L., Deng, Lianfu, Clemens, Thomas L. +1 more·2005·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Mutations in the Wnt co-receptor LRP5 alter bone mass in humans, but the mechanisms responsible for Wnts actions in bone are unclear. To investigate the role of the classical Wnt signaling pathway in osteogenesis, we generated mice lacking the beta-catenin or adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) genes in osteoblasts. Loss of beta-catenin produced severe osteopenia with striking increases in osteoclasts, whereas constitutive activation of beta-catenin in the conditional Apc mutants resulted in dramatically increased bone deposition and a disappearance of osteoclasts. In vitro, osteoblasts lacking the beta-catenin gene exhibited impaired maturation and mineralization with elevated expression of the osteoclast differentiation factor, receptor activated by nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL), and diminished expression of the RANKL decoy receptor, osteoprotegerin. By contrast, Apc-deficient osteoblasts matured normally but demonstrated decreased expression of RANKL and increased osteoprotegerin. These findings suggest that Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in osteoblasts coordinates postnatal bone acquisition by controlling the differentiation and activity of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m501900200

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conditional knockout of β-catenin in osteoblasts increases RANKL and decreases OPG, while increased β-catenin activity reduces RANKL and increases OPG.

    “Other studies showed that the conditional knockout of ␤-catenin in osteoblasts resulted in increased expression of RANKL and decreased expression of OPG.Conversely, increased ␤-catenin activity in osteoblasts was shown to reduce RANKL and increase OPG expression (120).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 584

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]1. Gong, Y. ∙ Slee, R.B. ∙ Fukai, N. ... Cell. 2001; 107:513-523 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1925) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Boyden, L.M. ∙ Mao, J. ∙ Belsky, J. ... N. Engl. J. Med. 2002; 346:1513-1521 Crossref Scopus (1384) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Kato, M. ∙ Patel, M.S. ∙ Levasseur, R. ... J. Cell Biol. 2002; 157:303-314 Crossref Scopus (964) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Little, R.D. ∙ Carulli, J.P. ∙ Del Mastro, R.G. ... Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002; 70:11-19 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1123) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Babij, P. ∙ Zhao, W. ∙ Small, C. ... J. Bone Miner. Res. 2003; 18:960-974 Crossref Scopus (451) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. He, X. ∙ Semenov, M. ∙ Tamai, K. ... Development. 2004; 131:1663-1677 Crossref Scopus (905) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. De Paepe, A. ∙ Leroy, J.G. ∙ Nuytinck, L. ... Am. J. Med. Genet. 1993; 45:30-37 Crossref Scopus (28) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. Gong, Y. ∙ Vikkula, M. ∙ Boon, L. ... Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996; 59:146-151 PubMed Google Scholar
  9. [9]9. Van Wesenbeeck, L. ∙ Cleiren, E. ∙ Gram, J. ... Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003; 72:763-771 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (493) PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Jackson, A. ∙ Vayssiere, B. ∙ Garcia, T. ... Bone. 2005; 36:585-598 Crossref Scopus (146) PubMed Google Scholar
  11. [11]11. Polakis, P. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999; 9:15-21 Crossref Scopus (614) PubMed Google Scholar
  12. [12]12. Fujino, T. ∙ Asaba, H. ∙ Kang, M.J. ... Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100:229-234 Crossref Scopus (350) PubMed Google Scholar
  13. [13]13. Parfitt, A.M. ∙ Drezner, M.K. ∙ Glorieux, F.H. ... J. Bone Miner. Res. 1987; 2:595-610 Crossref Scopus (4992) PubMed Google Scholar
  14. [14]14. Haegel, H. ∙ Larue, L. ∙ Ohsugi, M. ... Development. 1995; 121:3529-3537 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [15]15. Huelsken, J. ∙ Vogel, R. ∙ Brinkmann, V. ... J. Cell Biol. 2000; 148:567-578 Crossref Scopus (550) PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [16]16. Fodde, R. ∙ Edelmann, W. ∙ Yang, K. ... Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91:8969-8973 Crossref Scopus (470) PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [17]17. Moser, A.R. ∙ Shoemaker, A.R. ∙ Connelly, C.S. ... Dev. Dyn. 1995; 203:422-433 Crossref Scopus (134) PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [18]18. Brault, V. ∙ Moore, R. ∙ Kutsch, S. ... Development. 2001; 128:1253-1264 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  19. [19]19. Shibata, H. ∙ Toyama, K. ∙ Shioya, H. ... Science. 1997; 278:120-123 Crossref Scopus (492) PubMed Google Scholar
  20. [20]20. Zhang, M. ∙ Xuan, S. ∙ Bouxsein, M.L. ... J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277:44005-44012 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (609) PubMed Google Scholar
  21. [21]21. Karsenty, G. Endocrinology. 2001; 142:2731-2733 Crossref Scopus (169) PubMed Google Scholar
  22. [22]22. Hofbauer, L.C. ∙ Schoppet, M. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2004; 292:490-495 Crossref Scopus (853) PubMed Google Scholar
  23. [23]23. Holmen, S.L. ∙ Giambernardi, T.A. ∙ Zylstra, C.R. ... J. Bone Min. Res. 2004; 19:2033-2040 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  24. [24]24. Kelly, O.G. ∙ Pinson, K.I. ∙ Skarnes, W.C. Development. 2004; 131:2803-2815 Crossref Scopus (241) PubMed Google Scholar
  25. [25]25. Nelson, W.J. ∙ Nusse, R. Science. 2004; 303:1483-1487 Crossref Scopus (2299) PubMed Google Scholar
  26. [26]26. Wheelock, M.J. ∙ Johnson, K.R. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2003; 15:509-514 Crossref Scopus (239) PubMed Google Scholar
  27. [27]27. Aronow, M.A. ∙ Gerstenfeld, L.C. ∙ Owen, T.A. ... J. Cell. Physiol. 1990; 143:213-221 Crossref Scopus (493) PubMed Google Scholar
  28. [28]28. Owen, T.A. ∙ Aronow, M. ∙ Shalhoub, V. ... J. Cell. Physiol. 1990; 143:420-430 Crossref Scopus (1419) PubMed Google Scholar Figures (6) Article metrics Supplementary materials (1) PDF (71.36 KB) Related Articles Advertisement Hide CaptionDownloadSee figure in Article Toggle Thumbstrip Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Download .PPT Home Access for Developing Countries Articles Papers in Press Current Volume Archive Editorials ASBMB Award Articles JBC Reviews Meeting Reports Thematic Series Virtual Issues Classics Reflections Editors' Picks JBC Communications eLetters Tabor Awards For Authors Information for Authors About Open Access Permissions Submit manuscript Submission Help Contact Us Contact Information Journal Info About the Journal Early Career Reviewers Editorial Board Image Gallery New Content Alerts All Topics Bioenergetics Cell Biology Computational Biology Developmental Biology DNA and Chromosomes Enzymology Gene Regulation Genomics and Proteomics Glycobiology and Extracellular Matrices Immunology Lipids Membrane Biology Metabolism

Authors
Holmen, S. L., Zylstra, C. R., Mukherjee, A., Sigler, R. E., Faugere, M.-C., Bouxsein, M. L., Deng, L., Clemens, T. L., & Williams, B. O.
Affiliations
  • Van Andel Institute (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Bart O.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
280
Issue
22
Pages
21162-21168
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146138547
Cited by
584
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 27
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR44410)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
β-catenin, Wnt signaling, bone formation, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, APC, osteopenia, RANKL, osteoprotegerin, bone mineralization, LRP5, osteoclastogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Bone and Bones, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Carrier Proteins, Cell Differentiation, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Femur, Gene Expression Regulation, Genotype, Glycoproteins, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Osteoblasts, Osteoclasts, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Signal Transduction, Trans-Activators, Genes, APC, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Protein, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin, Mice, Osteoprotegerin, RANK Ligand, Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review