The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultra-efficient Replication of Infectious Prions by Automated Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification
Open accessAbstract
Prions are the unconventional infectious agents responsible for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, which appear to be composed mainly or exclusively of the misfolded prion protein (PrPSc). Prion replication involves the conversion of the normal prion protein (PrPC) into the misfolded isoform, catalyzed by tiny quantities of PrPSc present in the infectious material. We have recently developed the protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) technology to sustain the autocatalytic replication of infectious prions in vitro. Here we show that PMCA enables the specific and reproducible amplification of exceptionally minute quantities of PrPSc. Indeed, after seven rounds of PMCA, we were able to generate large amounts of PrPSc starting from a 1x10(-12) dilution of scrapie hamster brain, which contains the equivalent of approximately 26 molecules of protein monomers. According to recent data, this quantity is similar to the minimum number of molecules present in a single particle of infectious PrPSc, indicating that PMCA may enable detection of as little as one oligomeric PrPSc infectious particle. Interestingly, the in vitro generated PrPSc was infectious when injected in wild-type hamsters, producing a disease identical to the one generated by inoculation of the brain infectious material. The unprecedented amplification efficiency of PMCA leads to a several billion-fold increase of sensitivity for PrPSc detection as compared with standard tests used to screen prion-infected cattle and at least 4000 times more sensitivity than the animal bioassay. Therefore, PMCA offers great promise for the development of highly sensitive, specific, and early diagnosis of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy and to further understand the molecular basis of prion propagation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protein misfolding, aggregation, and conformational strains in neurodegenerative diseases
Soto, C., & Pritzkow, S. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0235-9 · Cited by 1,180
Self-citationFormation of native prions from minimal components in vitro
Deleault, N. R., Harris, B. T., Rees, J. R., & Supattapone, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702662104 · Cited by 631
A Test for Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease Using Nasal Brushings
Orrú, C. D., Bongianni, M., Tonoli, G., Ferrari, S., Hughson, A. G., Groveman, B. R., Fiorini, M., Pocchiari, M., Monaco, S., Caughey, B., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1315200 · Cited by 355
Simplified ultrasensitive prion detection by recombinant PrP conversion with shaking
Atarashi, R., Wilham, J. M., Christensen, L., Hughson, A. G., Moore, R. A., Johnson, L. M., Onwubiko, H. A., Priola, S. A., & Caughey, B. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0308-211 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Saá, P., Castilla, J., & Soto, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 35245-35252
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121674689
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultra-efficient Replication of Infectious Prions by Automated Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m603964200
- The paper
- Saá, P., Castilla, J., & Soto, C. (2006). Ultra-efficient Replication of Infectious Prions by Automated Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m603964200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.