Glucose-stimulated Cdc42 Signaling Is Essential for the Second Phase of Insulin Secretion
Open accessAbstract
The small Rho family GTPases Cdc42 and Rac1 have each been shown to function in insulin exocytosis and are presumed to function in actin remodeling and insulin granule mobilization. However, whether either GTPase is required for the mobilization phase of insulin release (second phase) and are linked in a common signaling pathway has remained unknown. Here we demonstrate that small interfering RNA-mediated depletion of Cdc42 from isolated islets results in the selective loss of second phase insulin release. Consistent with a role in this nutrient-dependent phase, Cdc42 activation was detected exclusively in response to D-glucose and was unresponsive to KCl or non-metabolizable glucose analogs in MIN6 beta-cells. Cdc42 activation occurred early in secretion (3 min), whereas Rac1 activation required approximately 15-20 min, suggesting Cdc42 as proximal and Rac1 as distal regulators of second-phase secretion. Importantly, Rac1 activation and function was linked in a common pathway downstream of Cdc42; Cdc42 depletion ablated glucose-induced Rac1 activation, and expression of constitutively active Rac1 in Cdc42-depleted cells functionally restored glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Occurring at a time midway between Cdc42 and Rac1 activations was the phosphorylation of p21-activated-kinase 1 (Pak1), and this phosphorylation event required Cdc42. Moreover, small interfering RNA-mediated Pak1 depletion abolished Rac1 activation and glucose-stimulated insulin release, suggesting that Pak1 may mediate the link between Cdc42 and Rac1 in this pathway. Taken together, these data substantiate the existence of a novel signaling pathway in the islet beta-cell whereby Cdc42 functions as a key proximal transmitter of the glucose signal early in stimulus-secretion coupling to support the later stage of insulin release.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activation of Cdc42 leads to activation of Rac1, an effect that is mediated by p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1).
“Activation of Cdc42 leads to activation of ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1), an effect that is mediated by p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) (720).”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [720]
The section “Pak1 Functions in Mediating the Cdc42-dependent Activation of Rac1” reports that Pak1 depletion abolished glucose-induced Rac1 activation in MIN6 cells, supporting a Cdc42–Pak1–Rac1 pathway. The claim omits the pancreatic β-cell and glucose-stimulation context; the paper also notes that the order of activation can differ in other cells. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGenetic knockdown of PAK1 and Rac1 leads to impaired 2nd phase insulin secretion.
“Genetic knockdown of PAK1 and Rac1 leads to impaired 2nd phase insulin secretion (24, 720).”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [720]
The Results section ('Pak1 Functions in Mediating the Cdc42-dependent Activation of Rac1'; page not provided) reports that siRNA depletion of Pak1 inhibited glucose-induced insulin secretion by more than 50%. The paper links Pak1 and Rac1 to the second-phase pathway, but it does not report that Rac1 knockdown impaired secretion or that Pak1 knockdown selectively impaired the second phase; its direct selective second-phase knockdown result concerns Cdc42. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGlucose-induced remodeling of the submembrane actin network depends on glucose metabolism and is controlled by small GTPases such as Cdc42.
“It depends on glucose metabolism and is controlled by small GTPases such as Cdc42 (24, 720).”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [720]
The Results section (‘Metabolism of Glucose Is Required for Cdc42 Activation,’ page unavailable) shows that glucose metabolism is required to activate Cdc42. The Abstract links Cdc42 to cortical F-actin reorganization, but presents its role in actin remodeling as a suggestion and says how it signals remodeling remains unknown. The paper therefore supports the proposed pathway, not a direct finding that remodeling itself depends on glucose metabolism or is controlled by Cdc42. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGlucose-induced remodeling of the submembrane actin network is required for the full insulin secretory response.
“Glucose-induced remodeling of the submembrane actin network is required for the full insulin secretory response.”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [720]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lawrence, J. T., and Birnbaum, M. J. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 13320 -13325
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men
Rorsman, P., & Ashcroft, F. M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2017 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Wang, Z., & Thurmond, D. C. (2009) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.034355 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Self-citationLeech, C. A., Chepurny, O. G., & Holz, G. G. (2010) · Vitamins & Hormones · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381517-0.00010-2 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Targeting Small GTPases and Their Prenylation in Diabetes Mellitus
Gendaszewska-Darmach, E., Garstka, M. A., & Błażewska, K. M. (2021) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00410 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Oh, E., & Thurmond, D. C.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thurmond, Debbie C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 9536-9546
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2396332
- OpenAlex
- W2021681212
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- American Diabetes Association
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-067912, R01DK067912, R56DK067912)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Keywords
- Cdc42, Rac1, second-phase insulin secretion, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, pancreatic beta cells, Rho GTPases, stimulus-secretion coupling, insulin exocytosis, islets, actin cytoskeleton remodeling
- MeSH terms
- Insulin Secretion, Animals, Cricetulus, Glucose, Cricetinae, Insulin, Insulinoma, Signal Transduction, CHO Cells, cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Line, Tumor, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review