The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbohydrate Binding Specificity of a Fucose-specific Lectin from Aspergillus oryzae
Open accessAbstract
The alpha1,6-fucosyl residue (core fucose) of glycoproteins is widely distributed in mammalian tissues and is altered under pathological conditions. A probe that specifically detects core fucose is important for understanding the role of this oligosaccharide structure. Aleuria aurantia lectin (AAL) and Lens culimaris agglutinin-A (LCA) have been often used as carbohydrate probes for core fucose in glycoproteins. Here we show, by using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis, that Aspergillus oryzae l-fucose-specific lectin (AOL) has strongest preference for the alpha1,6-fucosylated chain among alpha1,2-, alpha1,3-, alpha1,4-, and alpha1,6-fucosylated pyridylaminated (PA)-sugar chains. These results suggest that AOL is a novel probe for detecting core fucose in glycoproteins on the surface of animal cells. A comparison of the carbohydrate-binding specificity of AOL, AAL, and LCA by SPR showed that the irreversible binding of AOL to the alpha1,2-fucosylated PA-sugar chain (H antigen) relative to the alpha1,6-fucosylated chain was weaker than that of AAL, and that the interactions of AOL and AAL with alpha1,6-fucosylated glycopeptide (FGP), which is considered more similar to in vivo glycoproteins than PA-sugar chains, were similar to their interactions with the alpha1,6-fucosylated PA-sugar chain. Furthermore, positive staining of AOL, but not AAL, was completely abolished in the cultured embryo fibroblast (MEF) cells obtained from alpha1,6-fucosyltransferase (Fut8) knock-out mice, as assessed by cytological staining. Taken together, these results suggest that AOL is more suitable for detecting core fucose than AAL or LCA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, X., Inoue, S., Gu, J., Miyoshi, E., Noda, K., Li, W., Mizuno-Horikawa, Y., Nakano, M., Asahi, M., Takahashi, M., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507375102 · Cited by 476
Self-citation
Cited by
High-sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins
Alley, W. R., Mann, B. F., & Novotny, M. V. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003714 · Cited by 310
Fucosylation and protein glycosylation create functional receptors for cholera toxin
Wands, A. M., Fujita, A., McCombs, J. E., Cervin, J., Dedic, B., Rodriguez, A. C., Nischan, N., Bond, M. R., Mettlen, M., Trudgian, D. C., et al. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.09545 · Cited by 90
Duncan, C., Prashar, A., So, J., Tang, P., Low, D. E., Terebiznik, M., & Guyard, C. (2011) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01304-10 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsumura, K., Higashida, K., Ishida, H., Hata, Y., Yamamoto, K., Shigeta, M., Mizuno-Horikawa, Y., Wang, X., Miyoshi, E., Gu, J., & Taniguchi, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 15700-15708
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059799534
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbohydrate Binding Specificity of a Fucose-specific Lectin from Aspergillus oryzae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m701195200
- The paper
- Matsumura, K., Higashida, K., Ishida, H., Hata, Y., Yamamoto, K., Shigeta, M., Mizuno-Horikawa, Y., Wang, X., Miyoshi, E., Gu, J., & Taniguchi, N. (2007). Carbohydrate Binding Specificity of a Fucose-specific Lectin from Aspergillus oryzae. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m701195200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.