Cited by 107Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysHeat shock proteins research

SPFH2 Mediates the Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated Degradation of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors and Other Substrates in Mammalian Cells

Open access
Pearce, Margaret M.P., Wang, Yuan, Kelley, Grant G., Wojcikiewicz, Richard J.H.·2007·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) receptors are endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane calcium channels that, upon activation, become substrates for the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway. Although it is clear that IP(3) receptors are polyubiquitinated upon activation and are transferred to the proteasome by a p97-based complex, currently nothing is known about the proteins that initially select activated IP(3) receptors for ERAD. Here, we sought to identify novel proteins that associate with and mediate the ERAD of endogenous activated IP(3) receptors. SPFH2, an uncharacterized SPFH domain-containing protein, rapidly associated with IP(3) receptors in a manner that preceded significant polyubiquitination and the association of p97 and related proteins. SPFH2 was found to be an ER membrane protein largely residing within the ER lumen and in resting and stimulated cells was linked to ERAD pathway components, apparently via endogenous substrates undergoing degradation. Suppression of SPFH2 expression by RNA interference markedly inhibited IP(3) receptor polyubiquitination and degradation and the processing of other ERAD substrates. Overall, these studies identify SPFH2 as a key ERAD pathway component and suggest that it may act as a substrate recognition factor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m701862200

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearce, M. M. P., Wang, Y., Kelley, G. G., & Wojcikiewicz, R. J. H.
Affiliations
SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Wojcikiewicz, Richard J.H.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
282
Issue
28
Pages
20104-20115
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981361420
Cited by
107
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 49194, R01DK056294, DK 56294)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
IP3 receptor, ER-associated degradation, endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein, polyubiquitination, VCP, calcium channels, protein degradation
MeSH terms
Animals, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Gene Expression Regulation, HeLa Cells, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Protein Binding, Ubiquitin, RNA, Small Interfering, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Peptides and Proteins, TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 2, Rats, Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review